民国时期天津脚行登记中的业权界定及纠纷

发布时间：2018-05-17 05:22

  本文选题：行业登记 + 业权　； 参考：《中国社会经济史研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：从业权制度的视角来看,天津脚行内部缺乏有效的业权界定,使其在清末民初的业权交易中产生大量纠纷。对于天津脚行而言,始于1936年的脚行登记不仅仅是一种行业管理制度,也是一种业权界定制度。通过行业登记,脚行的业权实现了从行业惯例向政府制度的转化,获得官方界定与保障。但与此同时,脚行规避了法规的业权限制,保留了业权自行流转的行业惯例。在行业登记过程中,脚行业权人围绕业权界定发生了激烈纠纷,在利益驱动下不断建构与解构脚行的业权谱系,以争取政府的认可。经过激烈的争夺,天津最终形成全市脚行业权格局。
[Abstract]:From the angle of view of the system of employment right, the lack of effective definition of ownership in Tianjin foot line makes it produce a large number of disputes in the transaction of title in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China. For Tianjin foot Bank, the foot registration, which began in 1936, is not only an industry management system, but also a title definition system. Through trade registration, the right of ownership of foot line realizes the transformation from trade practice to government system, and gets official definition and protection. But at the same time, foot-line circumvented the legal title limit and retained the trade practice of the right to self-circulation. In the process of trade registration, there is a fierce dispute about the definition of ownership in the foot trade, and the ownership pedigree is constantly constructed and deconstructed under the interest drive, in order to gain the recognition of the government. After fierce competition, Tianjin finally formed the right pattern of the city's foot industry.
【作者单位】： 天津师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJZL12-022) 天津师范大学博士基金项目(52WW1210)资助
【分类号】：F729;K262.9
，

本文编号：1900095