《时务报》期间汪、梁变法主张的比较研究
本文选题:《时务报》 + 汪康年 ; 参考:《宁夏大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:中国在鸦片战争以后,面临着前所未有的挑战,近代化之旅已然开始。在社会变革的浪潮中,知识分子表现出相当的热情,不同的政治派别为了中国的自强求富而不断努力。《时务报》作为激烈动荡时代的产物,就其本身和其所承载的内容而言,是知识分子探索救亡图存、发表变革主张的重要舆论阵地,在这一时期发挥了重要的作用。作为主要创办者,汪、梁二人在其存续期间利用这一舆论阵地阐述了大量政治见解与变法主张。汪、梁二人集中代表和反映了这一时期中国知识分子面对社会巨变所做出的反应。将汪、梁进行对比是因为汪康年和梁启超隶属于不同的政治派别,但是他们利用《时务报》为社会改良做出了贡献,二人具有代表性,是了解这一时代特征的一个窗口。本文从不同方面对汪、梁二人在《时务报》上发表的变法主张进行研究,旨在深入理解这一时期不同知识分子对社会变革的态度和设想。本文将从五章内容对汪、梁变法主张进行分析探讨。第一章通过对《时务报》进行探析,主要了解汪、梁二人与该报的关系,以及他们于该报创办过程中所发挥的作用。第二章通过汪、梁二人在《时务报》上对变法必要性认识的探究,进行比较,分析此种认识的社会根源与个体的知识结构之间的联系。第三章通过分析二人对于开议会、办学校的主张,进一步了解不同知识分子背后的社会力量之间的较量。第四章是分析汪、梁二人对工商求富和军事自强的变法主张,来深入探究近代中国知识分子对工商求富和军事自强的主张和设想。第五章通过对汪、梁变法主张的评析,着重就《时务报》的停刊原因进行宏观分析,同时对汪、梁二人的变法主张进行评价。通过对汪、梁在《时务报》上变法主张的比较研究,本文认为汪、梁二人的变法主张,对中国近代社会变革具有重要的宣传意义和启蒙意义,他们代表不同的政治派别,其变法主张除了反映个人对社会在各方面的设想外,更多的反映了不同派别的斗争和利益诉求以及其对社会变革的设想。但是作为知识分子,汪、梁二人并没有试图去弥合因不同派别斗争而产生的社会裂痕,而是加速了这种社会裂痕的扩张。
[Abstract]:After the Opium War, China is facing unprecedented challenges, and modernization has begun. In the wave of social change, intellectuals have shown considerable enthusiasm, and different political factions are constantly striving for China's self-imposed wealth. As a product of an era of intense turbulence, the Times Daily, as a product of the turbulent times, is itself and the content it carries. It is an important position of public opinion for intellectuals to explore and save the nation and proclaim reform, which played an important role in this period. As the main founder, Wang and Liang expounded a great deal of political opinions and reform ideas during their existence. Wang and Liang mainly represented and reflected the reaction of Chinese intellectuals to the great changes in society during this period. Wang and Liang were compared because Wang Kangnian and Liang Qichao belonged to different political factions, but they made contributions to social improvement by using the "Shi Wei Bao". They are representative and a window to understand the characteristics of this era. This paper studies Wang and Liang's opinions on reform from different aspects, in order to understand deeply the attitudes and ideas of different intellectuals to social change in this period. This article will analyze and discuss Wang and Liang's reform method from five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the relationship between Wang and Liang and their role in the founding of the newspaper. The second chapter compares Wang and Liang's understanding of the necessity of reform and analyzes the relationship between the social origin of this understanding and the individual's knowledge structure. In the third chapter, through the analysis of the two people's ideas of running a parliament and running a school, we can further understand the contest between the social forces behind different intellectuals. The fourth chapter is the analysis of Wang and Liang's views on the reform of industrial and commercial pursuit of wealth and military self-improvement, to explore the modern Chinese intellectuals' views and ideas on industrial and commercial pursuit of wealth and military self-improvement. The fifth chapter analyzes Wang and Liang's stand of reform, and analyzes the reason of stopping publication. At the same time, it evaluates Wang's and Liang's idea of reform. Through a comparative study of Wang and Liang's views on reform in the "time Affairs", this paper holds that Wang and Liang's views on reform are of great propaganda and enlightenment significance to the social change in modern China, and that they represent different political factions. In addition to reflecting the individual's assumption of the society in all aspects, the reform proposal reflects the struggle and interest demands of different factions and their vision of social change. But as intellectuals, Wang and Liang did not try to bridge the social rift caused by the struggle between different factions, but accelerated the expansion of the social rift.
【学位授予单位】:宁夏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K252
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王惠荣;;《时务报》内讧背后的学派与地域之争[J];南通大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
2 朱至刚;;人脉与资金的聚合——从汪康年、黄遵宪合作看《时务报》的创立[J];近代史研究;2011年05期
3 李里峰;;中国近代史上的保守与激进——以汪康年为例的思想史阐释[J];广东社会科学;2010年05期
4 谢丹;;《时务报》的民权宣传研究[J];湖北社会科学;2010年07期
5 黄旦;詹佳如;;同人、帮派与中国同人报——《时务报》纷争的报刊史意义[J];学术月刊;2009年04期
6 郭常英;张秀丽;;传统社会心理对汪康年政治态度的影响[J];中州学刊;2008年04期
7 朱至刚;;《时务报》内讧的传播分析——以汪康年和梁启超的相互想象为中心[J];国际新闻界;2006年10期
8 马勇;;近代中国知识分子的悲剧——试论《时务报》内讧[J];安徽史学;2006年01期
9 吴果中;;《时务报》与中国近代公共舆论空间的建构[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2005年06期
10 潘光哲;;《时务报》和它的读者[J];历史研究;2005年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 许莹;办报干政的另一种探索[D];华中科技大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 章光伟;戊戌时期汪康年政治思想研究[D];浙江师范大学;2013年
2 郝艳彤;试论汪康年与《时务报》[D];河北大学;2007年
3 张丽婕;清末知识分子办报的困境[D];华中师范大学;2007年
4 方慧琪;《时务报》的舆论变化与近代政治权势纷争[D];安徽大学;2007年
5 普进;梁启超:近代报刊与民主启蒙[D];武汉大学;2005年
,本文编号:1907803
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1907803.html