“斯密型增长”——基于近代中国乡村工业的再评析

发布时间:2018-05-20 01:25

  本文选题:斯密型增长 + 乡村工业 ; 参考:《历史研究》2017年02期


【摘要】:近30年来,国际经济史学界围绕"斯密型增长"模式产生了一系列重要的学术观点与论争,而近代中国乡村工业则为我们分析和反思这些理论提供了极好的参照。以蚕丝和织布为代表的近代乡村工业的发展主要得益于市场或"斯密型动力"的驱动,也体现了"勤勉革命"的基本特征;人口压力虽然存在,但影响并不明确。乡村工业的"斯密型增长"在一定程度上推动了经济发展和收入提高,其技术变迁也具有明显的劳动密集型特征,但仅凭借"斯密型增长"并不足以将近代中国导入工业化和高速经济增长,中国工业化的实现和向"库兹涅茨型增长"转变的成功,最终有赖于新中国政府调控与市场机制的有效配合。
[Abstract]:In the past 30 years, the international economic history circles have produced a series of important academic viewpoints and debates around the "Smith growth" model, and the modern Chinese rural industry has provided us with excellent reference for analyzing and rethinking these theories. The development of modern rural industry, represented by silk and weaving, was mainly driven by the market or "Smith power", which also reflected the basic characteristics of "industrious revolution". Although the population pressure existed, the influence was not clear. The "Smith growth" of rural industry to a certain extent promoted economic development and income improvement, and its technological changes also had obvious labor-intensive characteristics. However, "Smith growth" alone is not enough to introduce modern China into industrialization and high-speed economic growth, and the realization of China's industrialization and the success of its transformation to "Kuznets growth". In the end, it depends on the effective coordination of government regulation and market mechanism of the people's Republic of China.
【作者单位】: 南开大学经济研究所;
【分类号】:F429;K25

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 黄小彤;;战后工业化的努力:乡村工业示范的兴起和发展[J];中国农史;2006年01期

2 杨会清;近代(1840-1919)赣东北地区乡村工业的兴衰研究[J];江西师范大学学报;2004年03期

3 孟玲洲;;城乡关系变动与乡村工业变迁——以近代天津与高阳织布业的发展为例[J];华南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

4 ;[J];;年期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 倪敬敏;论穆藕初改善乡民生计的认识与实践[D];苏州大学;2014年



本文编号:1912573

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1912573.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户97a33***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com