火器引进与淮军军事改革

发布时间：2018-06-03 22:47

本文选题：淮军 + 军事改革　；参考：《国防科学技术大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文首先界定了“军事近代化”的概念,并以此为标准审视淮军军事改革,指出其成功之处在于引进了西方先进武器和军事训练方法,不足之处在于未能实现军事编制体制、作战指挥机构、兵役制度和军人素质的近代化转型。在此基础上,进一步探究了淮军未能实现军事近代化的原因,认为它是由晚清中国特殊的政治、经济、文化格局和淮军自身陈旧的战争经验共同造成的。有鉴于此,本文得出以下结论和启示：先进武器并不必然引起作战方式的变革,作战方式的改变是人、武器、战场态势三者有机结合的产物,它们由总的社会发展状况所决定；军事技术与军事体系中的其他要素之间存在着相关性联系而非严格的因果联系；后发模仿型的军事改革中,脱离了战场经验,作战方式的变革将更多地依靠参与者的主观能动性来实现。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the concept of "military modernization" is defined, and the military reform of Huai military is examined on the basis of this concept. It is pointed out that the success of the reform lies in the introduction of advanced western weapons and military training methods, and the deficiency lies in the failure to realize the system of military establishment. Combat command, military service and the quality of the modern transformation of the military. On this basis, the reason why Huai Army failed to realize military modernization is further explored, which is caused by the special political, economic and cultural pattern of the late Qing Dynasty and the old war experience of Huai Army itself. In view of this, this paper draws the following conclusions and enlightenments: advanced weapons do not necessarily cause the change of combat mode, the change of combat mode is the result of the organic combination of man, weapon and battlefield situation, which is determined by the general social development; There is a correlation between military technology and other elements of the military system, rather than a strict causal link. The change of combat mode will depend more on the subjective initiative of the participants.
【学位授予单位】：国防科学技术大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：E295;K256

【相似文献】