清帝国的崩溃与“中华民族”称谓的起源与演绎
发布时间:2018-06-27 11:51
本文选题:清帝国 + 民族主义 ; 参考:《浙江大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 当清帝国面临崩溃危机时,政治变革诉求强烈,各种社会思潮彼此激荡,其中民族主义以其自身独有的特性在中国政坛和思想界引起巨大回响。在民族主义思潮的推动下,“中华民族”一词首先在社会思想界作为建设国家规划民族关系的设想提出来。此后经过不断地争论演绎,“中华民族”内涵也随之不断更新,从最初的指代“汉人”到“以汉人文化融合同化其他民族的文化共同体”直至最后形成“各民族平等共存的政治共同体即现代民族国家”。这个演绎过程也是对民族主义从传统民族观和西方现代民族理论两个不同方向上加以发挥的结果。同时在并行的政治改革实践过程中,以晚清改革、民国初年的法定政治符号的传播等一系列政治事件为例,说明“中华民族”这一称谓逐渐地被大众熟知并接受以及政府通过法律程序加以确认的过程。直至今天,“中华民族”已演绎为中国最为流行的蕴含着广泛的政治、社会、文化寓意的积极词汇之一。
[Abstract]:When the Qing Empire was facing the crisis of collapse, the demands of political change were strong, and various social trends of thought stirred up each other, among which nationalism caused a huge echo in Chinese political and ideological circles with its own unique characteristics. Driven by the trend of nationalism, the term "Chinese nation" was first put forward in the field of social thought as a plan for the construction of national relations. After constant argument and deduction, the connotation of the "Chinese nation" has been constantly updated. From the initial reference to "Han people" to "assimilate the cultural community of other nationalities with the integration of Han culture" until the formation of "political community that all nationalities coexist equally, that is, the modern nation-state". This deductive process is also the result of nationalism from two different directions: the traditional national view and the western modern national theory. At the same time, in the process of parallel political reform, a series of political events, such as the reform of the late Qing Dynasty and the dissemination of legal political symbols in the early years of the Republic of China, were taken as examples. It shows that the term "Chinese nation" has gradually been known and accepted by the public and confirmed by the government through legal procedures. Up to now, "Chinese nation" has been interpreted as one of the most popular positive words with broad political, social and cultural implications in China.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K252
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 潘先林;;略论南京临时政府处理民族问题的政策及设想[J];中国藏学;2008年04期
2 侯德彤;汉文中“民族”一词的出现并非始自《东籍月旦》——质疑近年来民族研究中的一个学术观点[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2002年06期
3 陈艳飞;关于“中华民族”的语境含义研究[J];东疆学刊;2005年02期
4 张双志;;略论“中华”的起源和涵义[J];黑龙江民族丛刊;2006年03期
5 马敏;;政治象征/符号的文化功能浅析[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
6 张生;论汪伪对国民党政治符号的争夺[J];抗日战争研究;2005年02期
7 陈其泰;;中华民族在近代的觉醒[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
8 邸永君;“民族”一词见于《南齐书》[J];民族研究;2004年03期
9 郝时远;中文“民族”一词源流考辨[J];民族研究;2004年06期
10 俞祖华;近代中国民族主义的类型、格局及主导价值[J];齐鲁学刊;2001年02期
,本文编号:2073830
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2073830.html