论改革开放以来多卷本中华人民共和国通史研究
发布时间:2018-08-09 10:24
【摘要】: 改革开放以来,中华人民共和国史的研究取得了可喜的成绩,多卷本“中华人民共和国通史”的编撰也取得不少成果。对国史研究进行的研究也有所开展,但对一些规模较大的通史型国史的深入研究还较少。学术史的批评与总结是促进自身发展的最有效途径。笔者从20世纪80年代、20世纪90年代、2000年以来,以这三个年代为阶段,采用历史比较研究的方法,选取各阶段比较有代表性的多卷本国史通史进行比较、分析和评价,以梳理不同时期多卷本国史通史的编撰特点、取得的成就与不足。总结改革开放30年来多卷本国史通史编撰的经验和教训,探索和思考多卷本国史通史的编撰存在的方式,明确得失,加强它的一些薄弱环节,促进国史学科建设,为其以后的编撰提供一些启示。 本文的前言部分,界定了一些概念,明确了本文的研究对象、多卷本国史通史的选择标准和所分阶段及其原因,综述了改革开放30年来国史的研究状况,阐明了本文的宗旨、研究思路和创新点。正文分为四章: 第一章,主要探讨20世纪80年代多卷本国史通史的编撰状况,分为两节来叙述,第一节主要详述了80年代多卷本国史通史编撰的背景和条件;第二节主要是选取了两套多卷本国史通史进行详细分析和评价。该时期多卷本国史通史初具成型。 第二章,主要探讨20世纪90年代多卷本国史通史的编纂状况,分两节来叙述,第一节主要详述了90年代多卷本国史通史编纂的背景和条件;第二节主要是选取了四套多卷本国史通史进行详细分析、比较和评价。该时期多卷本国史通史纷纷出版,以资料性史书为主,多角度、立体性的反映国史风貌,但有通史之形而无其神韵。 第三章,主要探讨21世纪初期多卷本国史通史的编撰状况,分两节来叙述,第一节阐述了2000年以来多卷本国史通史编著的背景和条件;第二节选取了8套多卷本国史通史进行深入分析、比较和评价。该时期史料性多卷本国史通史,规模渐大,内容更为丰富;研究性多卷本国史通史进一步细化和加深,朝着专著性发展,但内容所及范围还不够宽广,尚未突破政治史、中共党史的旧圈。总体上来说,该时期的多卷本国史通史,体裁不一、风格多样,其编撰已朝着规范化和科学化的道路迈进。追求特色亦成为趋势。但它要达到规律性与丰富性相统一,融会贯通,还有很长路要走。 第四章,主要从史学思想和编撰理论、方法两个方面整体总结30年来多卷本国史通史编撰的主要特点以及存在的问题和尝试提出解决问题的途径。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, great achievements have been made in the study of the history of the people's Republic of China, as well as the compilation of the general history of the people's Republic of China in many volumes. The research on the study of national history is also carried out, but there are few in-depth studies on some larger general history of China. The criticism and summary of academic history is the most effective way to promote self-development. From the 1980s to the 1990s and from the year 2000, taking these three periods as the stages, the author selects the representative multi-volume national history of each stage to compare, analyze and evaluate, using the method of historical comparative study. In order to comb the different periods of many volumes of national history compilation characteristics, achievements and shortcomings. Summing up the experience and lessons of compiling the history of our country in the past 30 years since the reform and opening up, exploring and thinking about the existing ways of compiling the history of our country in many volumes, making clear the gains and losses, strengthening some weak links, and promoting the construction of the discipline of national history. To provide some enlightenment for its later compilation. In the preface part of this paper, some concepts are defined, the object of this study, the selection criteria, stages and reasons of the history of many volumes of our country are defined, and the research situation of the history of our country in the past 30 years of reform and opening up is summarized, and the purpose of this paper is expounded. Research ideas and innovative points. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1980s, which is divided into two sections. The first section mainly describes the background and conditions of compiling the multi-volume national history in the 1980s, and the second section mainly selects two sets of multi-volume national history for detailed analysis and evaluation. In this period, many volumes of the history of the country have taken shape. The second chapter mainly discusses the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1990s, which is divided into two sections. The first section mainly elaborates the background and conditions of the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1990s. The second section mainly selects four sets of multi-volume national history for detailed analysis, comparison and evaluation. In this period, many volumes of national history were published one after another, mainly based on informative historical books, reflecting the style and features of national history from many angles and three dimensions, but having the form of general history without its charm. The third chapter mainly discusses the compilation of many volumes of national history in the early 21st century, which is divided into two sections. The first section expounds the background and conditions of the compilation of many volumes of national history since 2000. The second section selects 8 sets of multi-volume national history to carry on the thorough analysis, the comparison and the appraisal. In this period, the historical materials of many volumes of the history of our country have become larger in scale and richer in content, and the research and many volumes of the history of our country have been further refined and deepened, and developed towards the monograph, but the scope of the content is not broad enough to break through the political history. The old circle in the history of the Communist Party of China. On the whole, many volumes of national history in this period are of different genres and styles, and their compilation has moved towards standardization and science. The pursuit of characteristics has also become a trend. But it has a long way to go to achieve the unity of regularity and richness. In the fourth chapter, the author summarizes the main characteristics of the compilation of the history of the country in the past 30 years, the existing problems and the ways to solve the problems from the historical thought and the compilation theory, and the methods and methods.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K27
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, great achievements have been made in the study of the history of the people's Republic of China, as well as the compilation of the general history of the people's Republic of China in many volumes. The research on the study of national history is also carried out, but there are few in-depth studies on some larger general history of China. The criticism and summary of academic history is the most effective way to promote self-development. From the 1980s to the 1990s and from the year 2000, taking these three periods as the stages, the author selects the representative multi-volume national history of each stage to compare, analyze and evaluate, using the method of historical comparative study. In order to comb the different periods of many volumes of national history compilation characteristics, achievements and shortcomings. Summing up the experience and lessons of compiling the history of our country in the past 30 years since the reform and opening up, exploring and thinking about the existing ways of compiling the history of our country in many volumes, making clear the gains and losses, strengthening some weak links, and promoting the construction of the discipline of national history. To provide some enlightenment for its later compilation. In the preface part of this paper, some concepts are defined, the object of this study, the selection criteria, stages and reasons of the history of many volumes of our country are defined, and the research situation of the history of our country in the past 30 years of reform and opening up is summarized, and the purpose of this paper is expounded. Research ideas and innovative points. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1980s, which is divided into two sections. The first section mainly describes the background and conditions of compiling the multi-volume national history in the 1980s, and the second section mainly selects two sets of multi-volume national history for detailed analysis and evaluation. In this period, many volumes of the history of the country have taken shape. The second chapter mainly discusses the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1990s, which is divided into two sections. The first section mainly elaborates the background and conditions of the compilation of multi-volume national history in the 1990s. The second section mainly selects four sets of multi-volume national history for detailed analysis, comparison and evaluation. In this period, many volumes of national history were published one after another, mainly based on informative historical books, reflecting the style and features of national history from many angles and three dimensions, but having the form of general history without its charm. The third chapter mainly discusses the compilation of many volumes of national history in the early 21st century, which is divided into two sections. The first section expounds the background and conditions of the compilation of many volumes of national history since 2000. The second section selects 8 sets of multi-volume national history to carry on the thorough analysis, the comparison and the appraisal. In this period, the historical materials of many volumes of the history of our country have become larger in scale and richer in content, and the research and many volumes of the history of our country have been further refined and deepened, and developed towards the monograph, but the scope of the content is not broad enough to break through the political history. The old circle in the history of the Communist Party of China. On the whole, many volumes of national history in this period are of different genres and styles, and their compilation has moved towards standardization and science. The pursuit of characteristics has also become a trend. But it has a long way to go to achieve the unity of regularity and richness. In the fourth chapter, the author summarizes the main characteristics of the compilation of the history of the country in the past 30 years, the existing problems and the ways to solve the problems from the historical thought and the compilation theory, and the methods and methods.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孔明;《中华人民共和国历史长编》评介[J];北京党史研究;1997年05期
2 杨文利;;探索国史编撰体例上迈出的可喜一步 读《中华人民共和国史编年·1950年卷》[J];博览群书;2008年06期
3 吴敏先,祝志男,朱昌裕;近年来共和国史研究视点回顾[J];东北师大学报;2004年04期
4 王年一;我和《大动乱的年代》[J];党史博览;2005年09期
5 胡尚元;《中华人民共和国专题史稿》评介[J];党史研究与教学;2005年01期
6 吴敏先,翟洪峰,孙金凤,童小彪;1996~1998年中华人民共和国史研究十二大问题综述[J];当代中国史研究;1999年Z1期
7 李力安;努力开创国史研究工作的新局面[J];当代中国史研究;2000年04期
8 于沛;“国史研究的理论与方法”学术座谈会发言摘要 “全球史观”和当代中国史研究[J];当代中国史研究;2001年03期
9 邹兆辰;国史研究理论与方法的思考[J];当代中国史研究;2001年03期
10 朱佳木;关于中国当代史学科建设中的几个问题[J];当代中国史研究;2003年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 曹守亮;;史学批评与国史研究——中华人民共和国史研究的总结反思与理论发展趋势[A];史学批评与史学文化研究[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 曹守亮 当代中国研究所;[N];团结报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 郑s,
本文编号:2173785
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2173785.html