1927-1937年河南地权研究
[Abstract]:Land is the most important resource in rural areas, which plays a vital role in the development of rural areas. Without land, there will be no agricultural development. In the complex land relationship, land ownership is the core of the land relationship. Land ownership plays an important role in rural land and even the whole rural area, and affects the development of agriculture, the life of farmers and the whole operation of the countryside. In the 1920s and 1930s, due to the influence of many factors, Slow development of agriculture or even stagnation, rural crisis, a large number of farmers bankrupt. Some social groups "relief the countryside" and "rejuvenate the countryside" through various ways and means. By studying the land rights in Henan from 1927 to 1937, this paper, from the imperialist economic aggression, the "textualization" of the land policy of the Kuomintang government, the heavy imposition of taxes and the influence of the scourge of soldiers and bandits, The influence of natural disasters such as flood and drought and the annexation of land by landlords and warlords are discussed, and the influences of land rights on agricultural production, peasants' life and grass-roots power are analyzed. The results show that the rural land concentration, the dispersion of land use and the deterioration of land ownership structure led to the decline of rural areas, the bankruptcy of farmers, and the centrifugal tendency of peasants to the government, which affected the rule of grass-roots regime in rural society. Based on a large amount of historical data, this paper analyzes the changes of land rights in Henan Province from 1927 to 1937 by using various historical research methods. By observing this kind of change, this paper reveals the change of rural social operation, the change of peasants' life and the change of the rural power control of the basic level of Nanjing National Government. Through the phenomenon to see the essential changes in rural areas and to reveal the general law of social development.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:K263
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 骆正林;;近代中国乡村政治文化的变迁——国家政权建设与乡村传统权威的衰落[J];重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年02期
2 徐秀丽;;20世纪30年代的乡村公务人员——见之于农村复兴委员会的调查[J];河北学刊;2005年06期
3 贾贵浩;;论1912—1937年河南租佃制度的特点[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
4 刘正山;;土地兼并的历史检视[J];经济学(季刊);2007年02期
5 李自典;行政院农村复兴委员会初探[J];历史教学;2003年05期
6 金德群;民国时期农村土地的经营问题[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);1994年03期
7 王卫红;;20世纪二三十年代乡村危机研究综述[J];山西煤炭管理干部学院学报;2010年01期
8 王天奖;晚清时期河南地权分配蠡测[J];史学月刊;1993年06期
9 李金铮;邓红;;另一种视野:民国时期国外学者与中国农村调查[J];文史哲;2009年03期
10 苏新留;民国时期河南水旱灾害初步研究[J];中国历史地理论丛;2004年03期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 王合群;浙江“二五减租”研究(1927—1949)[D];华东师范大学;2003年
2 苏新留;民国时期水旱灾害与河南乡村社会[D];复旦大学;2003年
3 尹红群;民国时期的地方政权与地方财政(1927-1945)[D];浙江大学;2005年
4 张一平;地权变动与社会重构[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张永莉;二十世纪二三十年代北方乡村租佃制度及影响研究[D];西北大学;2004年
2 朱兰兰;20世纪初至30年代英美烟公司与河南烟草业[D];郑州大学;2004年
3 陈耀;浅论民国土地法的得失[D];西南政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2174220
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2174220.html