英法联军第一次火烧圆明园诸问题再考
发布时间：2018-08-20 14:54
【摘要】：圆明园在第二次鸦片战争中两遭焚掠,但关于第一次火烧圆明园事件的研究尚有不足之处。在将《圆明园劫难记忆丛书》中收录的英法联军一些主要人员的回忆录、书信集及公函、照会,与中方奏折档案、私人日记等比较研究后,可以发现:联军最初抵达圆明园是军事行动的自然结果;圆明园第一次遭到焚烧始于10月7日;英法联军及中国土匪共同参与了火烧行动;英法联军是劫掠圆明园的主要实施者,但中国土匪和部分百姓也参与了对圆明园物件的劫掠、捡拾和藏匿。
[Abstract]:Old Summer Palace was burned two times during the second Opium War, but the study of the first Old Summer Palace is still deficient. After comparing the memoirs, collections of letters and official letters, notes, notes of some key members of the Anglo-French coalition forces included in the "Old Summer Palace disaster memory Series," with the Chinese side's folio files, private diaries, and so on, It can be found that the initial arrival of coalition forces in Old Summer Palace was a natural result of military operations; the first burning of Old Summer Palace began on October 7; the involvement of the Anglo-French coalition forces and Chinese bandits in the operation; The Anglo-French coalition was the main perpetrator of the looting of Old Summer Palace, but Chinese bandits and some people were also involved in the looting, pick-up and concealment of Old Summer Palace objects.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学清史研究所;
【分类号】：K255
[Abstract]:Old Summer Palace was burned two times during the second Opium War, but the study of the first Old Summer Palace is still deficient. After comparing the memoirs, collections of letters and official letters, notes, notes of some key members of the Anglo-French coalition forces included in the "Old Summer Palace disaster memory Series," with the Chinese side's folio files, private diaries, and so on, It can be found that the initial arrival of coalition forces in Old Summer Palace was a natural result of military operations; the first burning of Old Summer Palace began on October 7; the involvement of the Anglo-French coalition forces and Chinese bandits in the operation; The Anglo-French coalition was the main perpetrator of the looting of Old Summer Palace, but Chinese bandits and some people were also involved in the looting, pick-up and concealment of Old Summer Palace objects.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学清史研究所;
【分类号】：K255
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王开玺;;英法被俘者圆明园受虐致死说考谬[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
2 王莲英;;火烧圆明园时间小考[J];北京社会科学;2008年02期
3 秦国经 ,王树卿;圆明园的焚q靃J];故宫博物院院刊;1979年04期
4 郑艳;英军焚毁圆明园原因考实[J];历史教学;2003年02期
5 吴继轩;李胜斌;;再论英法联军火烧圆明园的主要目的——兼与戴逸、章开沅等人商榷[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年02期
6 耿f;;孟斗班与第二次鸦片战争——新公布的档案文献揭露英军焚毁圆明园之真相[J];学术月刊;2006年01期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王开玺;英军焚毁圆明园原因辨析[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
2 王开玺;;英军焚毁圆明园事件与“国际法”[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
3 王莲英;;火烧圆明园时间小考[J];北京社会科学;2008年02期
4 袁蓉;;从江南名园到皇家苑囿——瞻园和如园造园艺术初探[J];东南文化;2010年04期
5 董首玉;;同治重修圆明园述评(1873-1874)[J];传承;2011年05期
6 孟彤;;从圆明园的九宫格局看皇家园林营造理念[J];华中建筑;2011年11期
7 鲁佳;;关于圆明园遗址保护[J];建筑史论文集;2000年02期
8 贾s，
本文编号：2194041
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2194041.html
