北洋视角与近代史研究

发布时间：2018-12-26 19:11

【摘要】：台海两岸的中国近代史研究,均深受革命党视角影响,近年来,有学者试图以"现代化范式"作为替代的可能选择,却因其浓厚的美国化色彩受到学界质疑。也许包容多种脉络、多元化的理解视角,更可让近代史研究丰富化。若从北洋的视角来考察近代史,从清末到抗战,北洋派都是重要的政治、军事、外交力量,甚至在实业、司法、教育等方面,都举足轻重,这期间许多历史脉络的连续性可能远超过断裂性。北洋时期实不宜只被视为无足轻重的过渡时期。若能打破过去南北隔绝对立,以北洋与革命相对立竞争的史观,改以南北统合的视角来重新考查民国历史,可能会对民国史有相当不同的体悟。北洋视角过去长期被革命史观遮蔽,当务之急,应是刊布北洋史料,保留北洋视角,为北洋研究奠定档案史料的基础。
[Abstract]:The study of the Chinese modern history on both sides of the Taiwan Straits is deeply influenced by the revolutionary party's perspective. In recent years, some scholars have tried to use the modern paradigm as an alternative to the alternative, but have been questioned by the academic field because of its strong American color. There may be a variety of context and a variety of understanding of the angle of understanding, which can enrich the research of modern history. If we look at the modern history from the perspective of the Arctic Ocean, from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the Anti-Japanese War, the Beiyang School is an important political, military and diplomatic force, even in the aspects of industry, justice and education. In the Arctic period, it is not appropriate to be regarded as a transitional period of insignificant importance. If it is possible to break the opposite of the north and the south, and to re-examine the history of the Republic of China in the view of the integration of the North and the South, it is possible to re-examine the history of the Republic of China in the view of the integration of the North and the South, which may have a very different understanding of the history of the Republic of China. in that past, the Beiyang visual angle has been shield by the revolutionary history of history, and it is urgent to keep the historical materials of Beiyang and keep the visual angle of the Beiyang and lay the foundation for the research of the Beiyang.
【作者单位】：东海大学历史系;
【分类号】：K258.2

【相似文献】