民国初年共和派与帝制派的论争

发布时间:2019-06-11 12:29
【摘要】:由于社会条件的不成熟,辛亥革命后建立的共和政治出现了种种问题,招致人们的批评。袁世凯及其拥护者利用此种批评,称共和制易造成内乱,不适合中国,而君主制则符合中国的历史与现实,有利于秩序的恢复与立宪政治的建立。由此引发共和派与帝制派的思想论争。在论争中,共和派揭破了帝制派假立宪、真专制的本质面目,捍卫了共和民主的价值,并提高了自身对于共和政治的认识,对共和政治试验中出现的问题,能给予理解,对中国建立共和民主的艰巨性、长期性,也有了明确的认识。
[Abstract]:Due to the immaturity of social conditions, there were various problems in Republican politics established after the Revolution of 1911, which led to criticism. Yuan Shikai and his supporters used this criticism to say that the Republican system is easy to cause civil strife and is not suitable for China, while the monarchy is in line with China's history and reality, and is conducive to the restoration of order and the establishment of constitutional politics. This led to the ideological debate between Republicans and imperialists. In the debate, the Republicans broke the essence of the false constitution of the imperial school, the true autocracy, safeguarded the value of Republican democracy, raised their own understanding of Republican politics, and were able to understand the problems arising in the Republican political experiment. There is also a clear understanding of the arduousness and long-term nature of building Republican democracy in China.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】:K258


本文编号:2497189

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2497189.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d0805***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com