“内亚—边疆”范式与新疆史研究——基于拉铁摩尔和傅礼初相关研究的考察

发布时间：2018-02-07 13:10

本文关键词： “内亚—边疆”范式拉铁摩尔傅礼初新疆史　出处：《史林》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：美国的新疆史研究位于内亚史和中国学研究两大学术领域中,具有明显的学科交叉性。拉铁摩尔(Owen Lattimore)在田野考察过程中积累出对"内亚边疆"的认识,他的"从边疆发现中国"的视角是"内亚—边疆"范式的开端;傅礼初(Joseph Fletcher)则是书斋中的学者,他关于"普遍联系"的"整体史"眼光清晰了"内亚—边疆"范式的叙事模式。拉铁摩尔从长城边疆解释中国历史,傅礼初则在"鸟瞰"内亚史过程中将"内亚"置于叙事的中心。两位学者的研究中都包含了对新疆史的论述,对他们的相关研究以及"内亚—边疆"范式进行梳理,有助于拓展新疆史研究的视野。
[Abstract]:The study of Xinjiang history in the United States is located in the two major academic fields of Neiya history and Chinese studies, and has a clear interdisciplinary intersection.#internal_person0# Owen Lattimore has accumulated the understanding of the "inner and sub-frontier" in the course of field investigation. His perspective of "discovering China from the Frontier" is the beginning of the paradigm of "Naya-Frontier", while Joseph Fletcheris is a scholar in his study. His vision of "the whole history" of "universal connection" clearly defines the narrative pattern of the "Neya-Frontier" paradigm. Lattimore explains Chinese history from the the Great Wall frontier. Fu Lichu put "Neiya" at the center of narration in the process of "bird 's-eye view". Both scholars' research included the exposition of Xinjiang history, their related research and the paradigm of "Neiya frontier". It is helpful to broaden the horizons of Xinjiang history research.
【作者单位】：陕西师范大学中国西部边疆研究院;新疆警察学院;
【基金】：2015国家民委民族问题研究项目“冷战后美国的新疆研究”(2015—GM—110)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K29

【相似文献】