杜文秀起义研究的新篇章

发布时间：2018-04-03 09:22

本文选题：杜文秀起义　切入点：中国近代史　出处：《回族研究》2010年01期

【摘要】：本刊2009年1—4期和今年第1期开辟了《杜文秀"卖国说"辩诬》栏目,先后发表了21篇文章,参与了郭沫若、范文澜二位前辈横加给中国近代史前沿杰出人物杜文秀"卖国主义"的讨论。学者们或利用英国伦敦保存的皇家档案资料,或查阅云南地方文史资料,或深入民间调查老百姓中祖辈相传的口碑资料,他们以大量的翔实的历史资料,论驳了郭、范二位学者横加给杜文秀的种种不实之词。本刊5期栏目的文章发表后,在读者中间引起了较大的反响,他们纷纷给编辑部来信,积极参与讨论。有的文章直陈杜文秀的历史功绩和历史地位;有的说郭、范二位学者对杜文秀只扣帽子、打棍子,没有拿出历史资料来说活,以势压人,这种文风不可取;有的建议杜文秀的讨论应把历史学、社会学等学科结合起来;有的批评当前史学之风的浮躁;有的更正了郭、范二位文章中引文的失实和曲解;有的说他们二位的文章只盯着英法殖民主义者怎么说,他们就怎么引,不做辨伪考证工作,这是个方法问题,还是立场问题;有的就中国传统学术,讲考据、义理、词章,二位学者似乎对这几方面都疏忽了,读者不理解;有的说回回民族在历史上出现过许多英雄人物,应该解放思想,冲破阻力,多多宣扬自己民族的英雄人物;有的引梁任公的话说,学术乃天下之公器,非一家一人所私有,应该允许大家热烈讨论杜文秀,这是一件有利于民族团结、社会和谐的好事。在此,我们编辑部对大家的来信参加讨论和对开辟《杜文秀"卖国说"辩诬》栏目的热情肯定,表示诚挚的谢意。现在,将大家的来信选择一部分刊载如下,以荐读者。
[Abstract]:In the first issue of 2009 and the first issue of this year, the magazine opened up a column entitled "du Wenxiu's Traitors" and "Defamation and falsehood", and published 21 articles one after another and participated in Guo Moruo.Two predecessors of Fan Wenlan have given a discussion to du Wenxiu, a leading figure in China's modern history.Scholars either make use of the royal archives kept in London, England, or consult the local literature and history of Yunnan, or go deep into the folk investigation of the word-of-mouth materials handed down by the ancestors of the common people. They refute Guo with a large amount of informative historical materials.Fan Erzi scholars gave du Wenxiu all sorts of false words.After the publication of the fifth issue of our magazine, it caused a great response among the readers. They wrote to the editorial board and actively participated in the discussion.Some articles directly state du Wenxiu's historical achievements and historical status, some say that Guo and Fan Er-scholars only use their hats and sticks to du Wenxiu, and they do not produce historical materials to say that they live and press people with their own power, and this style of writing is not desirable.Some suggest that the discussion of du Wenxiu should combine history and sociology, some criticize the impetuosity of the current style of historiography, some correct the misrepresentation and misinterpretation of the citations in Guo and Fan's articles;Some say that their articles only focus on what the British and French colonialists say, and they do not do the work of discriminating forgeries. This is a matter of method or a matter of stand. Some of them talk about textual research, theory, and ci and regulations in terms of traditional Chinese learning.Two scholars seem to neglect these aspects, readers do not understand; some said Hui nationality in the history of many heroes, we should emancipate our minds, break through the resistance, promote their own national heroes;Some quoted Liang Rengong as saying that learning is a public instrument in the world, and should not be owned by one family. We should allow people to discuss du Wenxiu enthusiastically. This is a good thing that is conducive to national unity and social harmony.Here, our editorial department expresses its sincere thanks to everyone for their letters to participate in the discussion and to express sincere thanks for the enthusiasm and affirmation of opening up "du Wenxiu's traitorous" "falsely accused" column.Now, the selection of your letters published below, in order to recommend readers.
【作者单位】：云南省博物馆;
【分类号】：K281.3;K254.43

【相似文献】