对敦煌文献中“大事纪年”的两种汉语译文之比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-04 20:41

本文选题：吐蕃文献　切入点：大事纪年　出处：《西藏大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文对敦煌吐蕃文献中大事纪年的两种汉译文进行了比较研究1990年敦煌石室藏经洞的遗书被发现到今天,已经过去了一百年。藏经洞的发现是我国文化史上的一个奇迹,它的名声已远国内外,它的影响所及靡远不届。敦煌莫高窟发现的文献中除汉文以外还有若干少数民族的文献,比如藏文、回纥文、吐火文、西夏文等,其中藏文文献的比重最大,内容最丰富。在少数民族的文献中位居第一。到目前为止,在敦煌石室发现的藏文献卷帙,已达到六千多。它对藏族的历史、文学、语言、宗教、医药等各领域的研究提供了不可估量的文献资料,也对其他民了解古代藏族社会、宗教、人们的思想观念等也提供了宝贵的资料。敦煌17号窟的开启,打响了敦煌研究的炮声,同时对藏学研究也开辟了一条新路,因为敦煌出土的吐蕃文献是藏学研究中不可或缺的文献资料,它的珍贵性就在于它是当时的藏人记录当时社会历史,长期埋没在沙尘之下,不染后来者笔墨的第一材料,如此珍贵的文献资料,国内外的藏学专家如获珍宝,极其重视。其中的很多资料已翻译到多国语言。本论文从两本汉译的吐蕃文献中选出大事纪年进行了比较全面的分析,概括分为三个方面:第一、译文对比,着重分析原文与译文的思想内容,核查译文能否表达原文的思想内容。第二、对大事纪年中的有些历史事件,翻阅相关资料,如实地阐释不同研究者的观点及见解,提出自己的疑点。第三、对译文中没有规范统一的名词术语,有些内容的表达上,依照译文,进行对比分析,列出自己的译法。本文共分为三章。第一章概说敦煌吐蕃文献与敦煌文献封闭的历史背景第二章分析大事纪年的原文与译文第三章对大事纪年的两种汉语译文之评析
[Abstract]:This paper makes a comparative study of the two Chinese translations of the great chronicles in the Dunhuang Tibetan literature. A hundred years have passed since the discovery of the remains of the Dunhuang Stone Room in 1990.The discovery of Tibetan Classics Cave is a miracle in the history of Chinese culture, its fame has been far from home and abroad, and its influence is far from over.Among the documents found in Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes, besides Chinese, there are also some documents of ethnic minorities, such as Tibetan, Huihe, Tuhuo, Xixia, etc. Among them, Tibetan literature has the largest proportion and the most abundant content.It ranks first in the literature of ethnic minorities.Up to now, the volume of literature found in Dunhuang Stone Room has reached more than 6,000.It provides inestimable documents for the study of Tibetan history, literature, language, religion, medicine and so on, and also provides valuable information for other people to understand ancient Tibetan society, religion, people's ideas, etc.The opening of Grottoes 17 in Dunhuang made the artillery sound of Dunhuang research. At the same time, it opened a new way to the study of Tibetan studies, because the Tibetan literature unearthed in Dunhuang is an indispensable document in the study of Tibetan studies.Its value lies in the fact that it was the first material recorded by the Tibetans at that time, buried under the dust for a long time, and not stained with the pen and ink of the latecomers. Such precious literature and materials have been attached great importance to by the Tibetan experts at home and abroad.Many of these materials have been translated into many languages.This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the chronology of events from two Chinese-translated Tibetan documents, which is divided into three aspects: first, the comparison of the translation, with emphasis on the ideological content of the original text and the translation.Check whether the translation can express the original text.Secondly, some historical events in the chronicle of events are reviewed, the viewpoints and opinions of different researchers are explained truthfully, and their own doubts are put forward.Third, there are no standardized noun terms in the translation, some contents are expressed according to the translation, and their own translation methods are listed.This paper is divided into three chapters.Chapter one: an introduction to the Historical background of Tubo Literature and the closure of Dunhuang documentsChapter II Analysis of the original text and the Translation of the year of the Great eventsChapter three: an Analysis of the two Chinese versions of the chronology of events
【学位授予单位】：西藏大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：K28

【共引文献】