青岛回归遗留问题研究
发布时间:2018-05-18 19:00
本文选题:山东问题 + 青岛回归 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:1914年8月,日本借口对德宣战,出兵山东造成了“山东问题”。一战后的巴黎和会不仅未能解决这一问题,反而让日本继承了德国在山东权益。这激起了中国人民的强烈反对,中国代表拒签和约,于是山东问题成为悬案。1922年4月的华盛顿会议上,中日双方签署了《解决山东问题悬案条约》及《附约》,使多年悬而未决的“山东问题”得到了初步解决。华盛顿会议上签订的《解决山东问题悬案条约》及《附约》使日本霸占青岛和山东的美梦破灭。但是,日本并未善罢甘休,在鲁案善后交涉谈判中不择手段,使谈判波折横生,攫取了不少条约中未有的权益。中国不仅要承担原本条约规定中不需支付的赎金,而且日本通过对部分职位安插日本人的方式仍掌握了一点的权力。而条约中将胶州开放为商埠的规定,使山东成为了各国可以共同侵略的对象。此外,由于中国依赖美、英的帮助,没能消除治外法权、取消势力范围等外国在华特权,反而因为“门户开放”的原则,变为几个帝国主义国家共同支配的局面。日本虽然在形式上将青岛交还给了中国,但是日本在青岛仍保留着大量的经济、政治特权,不时挑起事端,使山东地区的中日纠纷不断。日本继续在山东疯狂地进行经济渗透,倾销廉价商品,不断扩张日本在山东的经济势力,操纵和垄断了诸多行业,严重打击了山东民族工业的发展。收回青岛主权后,日本依然对青岛局势有着影响,涉及到政治、经济、社会等各个领域,对青岛回归遗留问题的探讨和研究,有助于更加深入、更加全面的认识日本的控制对青岛的影响。
[Abstract]:In August 1914, under the pretext of declaring war on Germany, Japan sent troops to Shandong to cause the "Shandong problem." The Paris Peace Conference after World War I not only failed to solve the problem, but also allowed Japan to inherit German rights and interests in Shandong. This aroused strong opposition from the Chinese people, and the Chinese representatives refused to sign the peace treaty, so the Shandong issue became a pending case. At the Washington Conference in April 1922, China and Japan signed the Treaty on the settlement of the outstanding case in Shandong Province and the Treaty attached to it, which has made the "Shandong issue", which has been pending for many years, preliminarily resolved. The Treaty on the settlement of the question of Shandong and the Treaty signed at the Washington Conference dashed the dream of Japanese occupation of Qingdao and Shandong. However, Japan did not give up, and by any means in the negotiation of the settlement of the Lu case, the negotiations were full of twists and turns, and Japan seized the rights and interests that had not been found in many treaties. Not only does China have to pay ransoms that are not required under the original treaty, but Japan still has a little power by placing some jobs in Japan. The treaty opened Jiaozhou as a commercial port, making Shandong the object of common aggression. In addition, because China depends on the help of the United States and Britain, it has not been able to eliminate extraterritorial jurisdiction and cancel the privileges of foreign countries in China, such as the sphere of influence. On the contrary, the principle of "opening up to the outside world" has become a situation in which several imperialist countries jointly dominate. Although Japan formally handed Qingdao back to China, Japan still retains a large number of economic and political privileges in Qingdao, provoking trouble from time to time, making Sino-Japanese disputes in Shandong region constant. Japan continues to carry on frantic economic infiltration in Shandong, dumping cheap commodities, expanding Japan's economic power in Shandong, manipulating and monopolizing many industries, and seriously hampering the development of Shandong national industry. After recovering the sovereignty of Qingdao, Japan still has an impact on the situation in Qingdao, involving political, economic, social and other fields. The discussion and study of the remaining issues left over by the return of Qingdao will help to deepen the situation. A more comprehensive understanding of the impact of Japanese control on Qingdao.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:K29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 居之芬;论战后赴日华工归国及遗留问题[J];抗日战争研究;2004年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 徐勇;;解决日本战争遗留问题的必要性和可能性[A];北京中国抗日战争史研究会建会20周年学术论文集[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈雅雯;青岛回归遗留问题研究[D];青岛大学;2015年
,本文编号:1906815
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/1906815.html