中国边疆史之“边缘社会”的管辖范围问题——以“匈奴模型”为例来探讨中原文化如何看待西北边疆地区的民族

发布时间：2018-06-06 02:46

本文选题：边缘社会 + 蛮夷原型　；参考：《青海民族研究》2012年02期

【摘要】：我们对于中国西北边疆发展史进行研究分析时,不管是何种历史阶段都必要考虑以下几个方面的问题:中国的所谓"中原文化常规模式(Chinese norm)"①及其与"边缘社会(marginal societies)"的互动和交流程度在于何种发展阶段。在此值得注意的是草原的游牧部落逐步引入到中原文化的社会模式而演变为其常模中的重要组成部分;"中心"与"边疆"(centerand periphery)在各自文化模式中的张力平衡和调节程度;从上述这两个文化模式显露的混合社会(mixed societies)及其复合型结构。本文在此强调的是边缘社会内的某些群体可以同时属于两个文化圈,即置身于中原农耕文化与草原游牧文化之间,从没被赋予其文化身份的合法性,逐渐发展成游牧半农耕社会独有的生活方式。无论是何种历史朝代,在中华文明发展史中游牧社会与中原之间的关系是沿着中国的边疆互动格局的演变而变化,也是上述三方面问题的必然结果。
[Abstract]:When we studied and analyzed the history of the development of the northwest frontier of China, It is necessary to consider the following questions at any historical stage: what is the stage of development of China's so-called "Central Plains cultural convention mode" and its interaction and communication with "marginal society". It is worth noting here that nomadic tribes in the grassland gradually introduced into the social model of the Central Plains culture and evolved into an important part of their norm, the tension balance and adjustment degree between the "center" and "frontier" and "border" in their respective cultural models; From the above two cultural models, the mixed society mixed social etiesand its complex structure are revealed. This paper emphasizes that some groups in the marginal society can belong to two cultural circles at the same time, that is, between the farming culture of the Central Plains and the nomadic culture of the grassland, they have never been given the legitimacy of their cultural identity. Gradually developed into a nomadic semi-farming society unique to the way of life. No matter what historical dynasty, the relationship between nomadic society and the Central Plains in the history of Chinese civilization is changing along the interactive pattern of China's frontier, and it is also the inevitable result of the above three problems.
【作者单位】：中央民族大学;
【分类号】：K289

【共引文献】