降汉以后的呼韩邪单于不是西汉的“外臣”而是西汉中央王朝的臣

发布时间：2018-06-28 21:35

本文选题：民族政策 + 呼韩邪降汉　；参考：《中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年06期

【摘要】：《秦、西汉的"内臣"与"外臣》一文所归纳的汉代"外臣"的"基本特点"及其匈奴呼韩邪单于"当然也不是汉王朝分封的诸侯或诸侯王"的论断,与历史事实存在着较大的差异,对于当时的匈奴呼韩邪政权不能适用。当时,西汉皇帝是君,匈奴呼韩邪单于是臣,西汉中央王朝与匈奴呼韩邪政权之间的关系是西汉中央政府与匈奴地方政权性质的关系。本文从政治、军事、经济以及所谓的"外交"方面,分析论证了降汉以后的匈奴呼韩邪单于已经不是西汉的"外臣",而是西汉中央王朝的臣。
[Abstract]:"the basic characteristics" of the "foreign ministers" in the Han Dynasty and the conclusion that the Xiongnu calls for Han evil "are not, of course, the princes or princes of the Han Dynasty", as summarized in the "Inner Ministers" and "the Foreign Ministers" of the Western Han Dynasty, in the Qin Dynasty and the Western Han Dynasty. There is a great difference from historical facts, which can not be applied to the Xiongnu's exuberant regime at that time. At that time, the emperor of the Western Han Dynasty was the emperor, and the Xiongnu called Han evil was the minister. The relationship between the Central Dynasty of the Western Han Dynasty and the Xiongnu Hu-Han evil regime was the relationship between the Central Government of the Western Han Dynasty and the local regime of the Xiongnu. From the aspects of politics, military affairs, economy and so-called "diplomacy", this paper analyzes and demonstrates that the Xiongnu exiled from Han Dynasty is no longer a "foreign minister" of the Western Han Dynasty, but a minister of the Central Dynasty of the Western Han Dynasty.
【作者单位】：内蒙古大学人文学院;
【分类号】：K289

【参考文献】