试谈二轮志书的编纂
发布时间：2018-08-07 11:13
【摘要】：第二轮志书与首轮志书相比的确存在不足,如可读性弱,篇幅偏大,歌功隐过,记"工作"多等,甚至在志稿阶段就存在诸多问题,但这些问题在首轮志书编纂过程中也同样存在,并非二轮修志独有。由此尚不能得出二轮志书不如首轮志书的结论。二轮志书与首轮相比,有其明显的进步之处,即篇目结构更趋合理和科学,时代特点和地方特点更加鲜明,入志资料更为齐备、可信,理论研究给予的支撑更为有力。评价志书应采用两点论,而不是一点论。如果评论不符合实际情况,也可能会挫伤地方志工作者的积极性。今后,修志业务工作还应注意以下几个问题:一是合理布局,二是显示特色,三是确保征信,四是控制篇幅,五是精雕细琢,六是研究理论。
[Abstract]:Compared with the first round, the second round of annals does have some shortcomings, such as weak readability, large space, hidden achievements in songs, more "work", and even many problems in the manuscript stage. However, these problems also exist in the first compilation of annals, and are not unique to the second cycle of annals. Therefore, it is not possible to draw the conclusion that two rounds of annals are not as good as the first round of annals. Compared with the first round, the second round of annals has its obvious progress, that is, the structure of the contents is more reasonable and scientific, the characteristics of the times and places are more distinct, the data of the entries are more complete and reliable, and the support given by the theoretical research is more powerful. The evaluation of annals should be based on two points, not a point. If the comments do not conform to the actual situation, it may also discourage the enthusiasm of local chronologists. In the future, we should also pay attention to the following problems: first, the rational layout, the second is to show the characteristics, the third is to ensure the information, the fourth is to control the length, the fifth is to elaborate, and the sixth is to study the theory.
【分类号】：K29
本文编号：2169842
[Abstract]:Compared with the first round, the second round of annals does have some shortcomings, such as weak readability, large space, hidden achievements in songs, more "work", and even many problems in the manuscript stage. However, these problems also exist in the first compilation of annals, and are not unique to the second cycle of annals. Therefore, it is not possible to draw the conclusion that two rounds of annals are not as good as the first round of annals. Compared with the first round, the second round of annals has its obvious progress, that is, the structure of the contents is more reasonable and scientific, the characteristics of the times and places are more distinct, the data of the entries are more complete and reliable, and the support given by the theoretical research is more powerful. The evaluation of annals should be based on two points, not a point. If the comments do not conform to the actual situation, it may also discourage the enthusiasm of local chronologists. In the future, we should also pay attention to the following problems: first, the rational layout, the second is to show the characteristics, the third is to ensure the information, the fourth is to control the length, the fifth is to elaborate, and the sixth is to study the theory.
【分类号】：K29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 武铁良;;续志大事记质量问题二十五例[J];广西地方志;2011年03期
2 任克良;;年鉴编辑中通稿与联审之商榷[J];新疆地方志;2011年02期
3 陈华;;二轮志书优特点浅析——以部分志书为分析样本[J];中国地方志;2011年07期
4 杨晓荣;索朗玉珍;;藏族传统测量方法探析[J];中国藏学;2011年03期
5 畅思;;论文化志编纂质量的系统控制[J];沧桑;2011年04期
6 任丽英;;志稿政治部类存在问题谈[J];广西地方志;2011年03期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 唐力行;;重构乡村基层社会生活的实态——值得深入考察的徽州古村落宅坦[A];中国农业历史学会第九次学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
，本文编号：2169842
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2169842.html
