台湾原住民的类别与族称述论
发布时间：2018-10-26 09:27
【摘要】：台湾原住民支系庞杂,族社众多。历史上台湾原住民类别的界定,以日据时期为界可分成两个阶段:一为明清时期的汉民族文化中心主义性分类,分类者主要是民间士人与地方官吏,类别的结果缺乏系统性,随意性强,没有科学凭据;二为日据时代以来的学术研究性分类,分类者是学有专长的人类学家、民族学家和考古学家,类别的依据为语言、文化、体质等民族特征,学术意涵浓厚。台湾原住民的族称多是异文化视野下的"他称",而非反映其自身认同与文化记忆的"自称"。
[Abstract]:Taiwan's aboriginal branches are numerous and numerous. In history, the definition of Taiwan aborigines can be divided into two stages: one is the cultural centralism of the Han nationality in the Ming and Qing dynasties, the classifiers are mainly folk scholars and local officials, and the results of the categories are lack of systematicness. Strong randomness, no scientific evidence; The second is the classification of academic research since the Japanese occupation period. The classifier is anthropologists, ethnologists and archaeologists with special expertise. The classification is based on the national characteristics of language, culture and physique, and has strong academic implications. The aborigines of Taiwan say that they are "he" from the perspective of different cultures, rather than "self-proclaimed", which reflects their own identity and cultural memory.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院;
【基金】：2008年国家社会科学基金项目(08CMZ004)
【分类号】：K28
[Abstract]:Taiwan's aboriginal branches are numerous and numerous. In history, the definition of Taiwan aborigines can be divided into two stages: one is the cultural centralism of the Han nationality in the Ming and Qing dynasties, the classifiers are mainly folk scholars and local officials, and the results of the categories are lack of systematicness. Strong randomness, no scientific evidence; The second is the classification of academic research since the Japanese occupation period. The classifier is anthropologists, ethnologists and archaeologists with special expertise. The classification is based on the national characteristics of language, culture and physique, and has strong academic implications. The aborigines of Taiwan say that they are "he" from the perspective of different cultures, rather than "self-proclaimed", which reflects their own identity and cultural memory.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院;
【基金】：2008年国家社会科学基金项目(08CMZ004)
【分类号】：K28
【参考文献】
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 罗春寒;清代台湾平埔族文化变迁之研究[D];中央民族大学;2005年
【共引文献】
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 熊南京;二战后台湾语言政策研究（1945-2006）[D];中央民族大学;2007年
2 周典恩;清代台湾拓垦中的族群关系研究[D];厦门大学;2007年
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周典恩;;台湾原住民的类别与族称述论[J];华南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
2 修瑭;;南投县文化之旅[J];台声;2009年04期
3 王文才;;破蛹展翅两相依——访台散记[J];黄河;2008年03期
4 廖献祥;;台湾光复60周年感怀[J];武汉文史资料;2006年02期
5 旷章华;;台湾行[J];黄埔;2010年03期
6 潘银良;中共与抗战时期的台湾光复运动[J];党史文苑;1996年06期
7 张晓哲;;青山一道同云雨 明月何曾是两乡——“战时首都重庆与台湾光复”学术论坛侧记[J];两岸关系;2007年12期
8 陈士诚;台湾光复说明了什么[J];w，
本文编号：2295276
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2295276.html
