明代中朝官修地理志书中的鸭绿江、图们江地理认识

发布时间：2018-11-28 16:58

【摘要】：在明代,中朝两国均纂修了代表性的官修地理志书。在对于鸭绿江、图们江地理的记载及认识方面,明朝的官修地理志书因沿袭了传统地志体例模式,"重中原而弱边疆"的记史方式,并继承了"华夷之限"的思想,以及采取了特殊的东北边疆治理政策,而展现出了较之前代几近停滞的认识。相比之下,朝鲜王朝的官修地理志书却因其对中国传统史学进行了扬弃,并基于其北方军事要求与王室需求乃至北疆的快速开拓,以及采取了与内地一致的北疆管辖政策,从而展现出了较之前代不断深化的认识。在导致中朝双方认识出现差异的这些原因背后,更有明朝传统"天下"观的包容型边疆观与朝鲜王朝基于疆土实利的务实型边疆观的不同,而这也正是双方差异如此巨大最深层次的根源。
[Abstract]:In the Ming Dynasty, both China and Korea compiled representative official books on geography. In terms of the records and understanding of the Yalu River and the Tumen River geography, the officials of the Ming Dynasty followed the traditional pattern of geographical chronology, the historical way of "emphasizing the Central Plains rather than the border areas", and inherited the thought of "the limit of Hua Yi". And adopted a special policy of governance of the Northeast Frontier, and showed the understanding of nearly stagnation in previous generations. In contrast, the official of the Korean dynasty, because of its sublation of the traditional Chinese historiography, based on its military requirements of the north and the rapid development of the royal family and even the northern frontier, and adopted a policy of jurisdiction in the north that is consistent with the mainland. Thus showing a deeper understanding than the previous generation. Behind these reasons that led to the difference in understanding between China and North Korea, there is the difference between the tolerant frontier view of the traditional "world" view of the Ming Dynasty and the pragmatic frontier view of the Korean dynasty based on the reality and interests of the territory. And this is also the root of such a huge and deepest level of difference between the two sides.
【作者单位】：天津师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：2017年国家社科基金青年项目“朝鲜王朝前期的北方经略与中朝界河形成诸问题研究”(项目编号:17CSS009)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K29

【相似文献】