从孙中山早年与澳门关系看历史论著的书写
发布时间：2019-05-27 20:21
【摘要】：正历史的真实性亦即客观性,是历史著作撰写的基本原则,对此人们当无异议。从理论上来说,历史的真相只有一种,无论什么样的历史学家只要他们按照历史的真实性原则进行研究和写作,写出的历史真相即作品的内容应该是基本相同的。然而在历史研究和撰写历史论著的实际过程中,相同的历史事件和相同的历史人物,写出的历史研究作品却往往会有不同,乃至截然相反。出现这种现象,也许和研究者违背了研究历史时所秉持的真实性原则有关,不过也不尽然,因
[Abstract]:The authenticity of positive history, that is, objectivity, is the basic principle of historical works, and people should have no objection to it. In theory, there is only one kind of historical truth. No matter what kind of historian studies and writes according to the principle of historical authenticity, the historical truth that is, the content of the work should be basically the same. However, in the actual process of historical research and writing historical works, the historical research works written by the same historical events and the same historical figures are often different, or even the opposite. The emergence of this phenomenon may have something to do with the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history, but not really, because of the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history.
【作者单位】： 河南大学近代中国研究所;
【分类号】：K29
，
本文编号：2486451
[Abstract]:The authenticity of positive history, that is, objectivity, is the basic principle of historical works, and people should have no objection to it. In theory, there is only one kind of historical truth. No matter what kind of historian studies and writes according to the principle of historical authenticity, the historical truth that is, the content of the work should be basically the same. However, in the actual process of historical research and writing historical works, the historical research works written by the same historical events and the same historical figures are often different, or even the opposite. The emergence of this phenomenon may have something to do with the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history, but not really, because of the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history.
【作者单位】： 河南大学近代中国研究所;
【分类号】：K29
，
本文编号：2486451
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2486451.html
