两轮《广东省志》工业类志书编修的比较研究

发布时间：2019-07-06 16:31

【摘要】：文章将首轮和第二轮《广东省志》工业类志书编修的情况进行了比较研究。1.篇目总体设计的比较。篇目结构上,首轮志书使用的是小篇体,二轮使用的是中篇体;资料性方面,首轮优于二轮;整体性方面,二轮胜于首轮。2.修志主体的比较。两轮修志过程中,行政管理部门和工业企业所起的作用不同;二轮工业类志书,行业学会在编修中起的作用比较突出。3.修志进度的比较。两轮工业志编修均出现了程度不等的停滞,而且实际完成时间与规划完成时间都有差距,只是首轮比二轮差距更大。4.志书质量比较。由于两轮工业志资料来源基础不同,首轮部门志的痕迹明显重于二轮。通过比较,对今后的修志工作也有所启示。第一,中篇结构更利于资料收集和志稿编写;第二,行政管理部门、行业协会、企业、高校及科研院所专家多个主体参与修志,多元化的修志格局已经形成,应充分调动各个修志主体的积极性;第三,提高志书质量可以从广泛搜集资料、加强培训人员、严格审查验收三方面着手;第四,通过加大地方志的宣传力度、依法修志、完善激励机制以及抓好开发利用等办法增强修志动力。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a comparative study on the compilation and revision of the first round and the second round of the Industrial Records of Guangdong Province. A comparison of the overall design of the title. In terms of the structure of the title, the first round of the journal uses a small volume, and the second round uses the middle one; in terms of information, the first round is superior to the second round; in the aspect of integrity, the second round is better than the first round. 2. The comparison of the main body of the study. In the process of two rounds of revision, the administrative departments and industrial enterprises play different roles; the second round of industrial records, the industry society plays a more prominent role in the compilation and revision. A comparison of the progress of revision. Both rounds of industrial revision have stagnated to varying degrees, and there is a gap between the actual completion time and the planned completion time, except that the gap between the first round and the second round is even larger. The quality of the records is compared. Due to the different data sources of the two rounds of industrial records, the traces of the first round of departmental records are obviously heavier than those of the second round. Through the comparison, it also has some enlightenment to the future revision work. First, the structure of the middle part is more conducive to data collection and manuscript preparation; second, administrative departments, trade associations, enterprises, universities and scientific research institutes experts participate in the study of records, a diversified pattern of revision has been formed, we should fully mobilize the enthusiasm of each subject; third, improving the quality of records can start from three aspects: extensive collection of data, strengthening of training personnel, strict examination and acceptance; Fourth, by strengthening the propaganda of local chronicles, revising the chronicles according to law, perfecting the incentive mechanism and doing a good job in the development and utilization of local chronicles, we should strengthen the motive force of the revision of local chronicles.
【作者单位】：广东省史志办;
【分类号】：F429;K29

【相似文献】