“九谛九解”之争新探——对晚明一桩学术公案的重新考察

发布时间：2018-05-12 09:22

本文选题：九谛九解 + 性　；参考：《湖北社会科学》2017年07期

【摘要】：晚明之时,围绕着心学中"无善无恶"的命题,许孚远与周汝登进行了一场反复持续的争论,史称"九谛九解"之辩。论辩围绕性体、工夫、教化三方面展开。许孚远批评"无善无恶"说不合圣人之教,周汝登则坚持心学的这一核心命题,对许孚远的批评逐一反驳。他们的争论显示出一个共同目标,就是都想用自己的体系来统一性、道、教三者,担当儒教大命,然而他们都不成功。
[Abstract]:In the late Ming Dynasty, Xu Fuyuan and Zhou Ruden had a continuous debate about the proposition of "no good and no evil" in the study of mind. The argument revolves around sex, work and education. Xu Fuyuan criticizes the theory of "no good and no evil" does not conform to the religion of sage, while Zhou Ru-deng insists on this core proposition of heart learning and refutes Xu Fuyuan's criticism one by one. Their argument shows a common goal, that is, they want to use their own system to unify, Tao, teach the three, to play the Confucian mandate, but they did not succeed.
【作者单位】：重庆大学人文社会科学高等研究院;
【基金】：重庆市社科规划办哲学社会科学规划研究项目博士项目“周汝登心学思想与晚明儒学本体论思想变迁研究”(2014BS016)阶段性成果中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(106112015 CDJSK 47 XK31)
【分类号】：K248.3

【相似文献】