“《翰学三书》本”《翰林记》校误举例

发布时间：2018-05-26 23:36

本文选题：《翰林记》 + 《翰学三书》　；参考：《古籍整理研究学刊》2017年02期

【摘要】：《翰林记》为明代史家黄佐所编纂的一部官署志。该书专记明代中前期翰林掌故,对研究明代翰林制度具有重要的史料价值。笔者在对读、比较不同版本过程中,发现目前通行的整理本("《翰学三书》本")在标点、文字等方面颇有讹误,不利于本书的利用,故略加条列讨论,冀于对本书的阅读、利用有所助益。
[Abstract]:Hanlin Ji was compiled by Huang Zuo, a historian of Ming Dynasty. This book is devoted to the story of Hanlin in the early Ming Dynasty, which is of great historical value to the study of the Hanlin system in the Ming Dynasty. In the course of reading and comparing different versions, the author finds that the current arrangement of books ("three books on John's study") is quite corrupt in punctuation and writing, which is not conducive to the use of this book. Therefore, it is necessary to add a list of discussions in order to read this book. Use helps.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K248

【相似文献】