回到国家建构——对清代历史研究中帝国主义路径的再分析

发布时间：2018-06-29 00:38

本文选题：清帝国 + 殖民主义　；参考：《史学理论研究》2017年02期

【摘要】："满洲殖民主义"作为新清史的主要理论来源之一,是濮德培等人将西方帝国主义理论运用到清朝历史解释上的一个结果,他们认为清朝作为一个帝国,于17—18世纪在内亚地区进行了殖民扩张,与同时代的欧洲列强、奥斯曼土耳其等存在相似性。这种观点建立在西方殖民主义理论研究的基础之上,在史实和逻辑上都存在着严重缺陷,有着强烈的意识形态色彩。我们在批判满洲殖民主义的同时,更应该注重回到国家构建的视角和路径,纠正我们以往研究中的思维误区,推进对清朝政治史的整体性、历时性研究。
[Abstract]:"Manchuria colonialism", as one of the main theoretical sources of the new Qing history, was a result of the application of Western imperialist theory to the historical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty by Putepei and others, who considered the Qing Dynasty as an empire. In the 17-18 th century, the colonial expansion in Nayas was similar to that of the European powers and Ottoman Turkey. This view is based on the theoretical study of colonialism in the West. It has serious defects in historical facts and logic, and has a strong ideological color. While criticizing Manchuria colonialism, we should pay more attention to go back to the angle of view and path of national construction, correct the mistake of thinking in our previous research, advance the whole and diachronic research on the political history of Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学清史研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“盛京城考古与清代历史文化研究”(项目批准号:14ZDB038)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K249

【相似文献】