当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 中国通史论文 >

《新元史》的编纂与校勘

发布时间:2018-08-12 08:35
【摘要】:《新元史》成于一人之手,而被列入"廿六史",成为正史的殿军之作,值得特别关注。民国初年梁启超、王国维等以"新史"的标准衡量此书,颇有批评,而日本学者的评价却从同于乾嘉学术的代表作《四库总目提要》的观点,显现出现代史学的吊诡。《新元史》的编纂始于清末,成于民初,跨越时代;其刊印先有铅排本,后有雕版本,实为复古。《新元史》的校勘,也存在庚午重订本讹误,反不如退耕堂初刻本之处,令人意外。
[Abstract]:The history of the New Yuan Dynasty was made into the hands of one man, and it was included in the "26 History" and became the work of the temple army in the official history, which deserves special attention. In the early years of the Republic of China, Liang Qichao and Wang Guowei criticized the book by the standard of "New History," but Japanese scholars commented from the same viewpoint as the masterpiece of the Qianjia academic work, "Summary of the four storeys". The compilation of "New Yuan History" began in the late Qing Dynasty and began in the early Republic of China. It was printed in a lead-lined form, followed by a carved version, which was in fact a retro. The collation of the "New Yuan History" also contained errors in rerevising the book at the end of the day. Instead, it is better to return to farming hall at the beginning of the original engraved place, surprising.
【作者单位】: 湖南科技学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金项目“《四库全书考证》整理与研究”(项目编号:17BTQ039)
【分类号】:K247


本文编号:2178519

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2178519.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c275a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com