“河图”、“洛书”非点阵之图考

发布时间：2018-10-15 15:15

【摘要】：欲判明先秦文献中所记载的"河图"、"洛书"是否点阵之图,首先应求于先秦文献中有关"河图"、"洛书"的原始记载。根据《尚书·顾命》、《论语·子罕》和《周易·系辞上》中有关"河图"、"洛书"的原始记载,无法得出"河图"、"洛书"是点阵之图的结论。非点阵之图的结论,是根据胡应麟"辨伪八法",核之并世之言以观其称,核之异世之言以观其述,称点阵之图为"河图"、"洛书"显属可疑,而且,刘牧在《易数钩隐图》的序言中自谓"采摭天地奇偶之数,……点之成图",无意之中,已露出了作伪的破绽。清代学者毛奇龄更将刘牧作伪之迹原原本本考察得十分清楚。刘牧为了使其创制的点阵之图为人所重且行之于世,于是将点阵之图托以"河图"、"洛书"之名,也完全符合作伪的一般规律。坚持认为"河图"、"洛书"为点阵之图者所持之论据,亦皆似是而非。因此,先秦文献中所记载的"河图"、"洛书"并非点阵之图。
[Abstract]:In order to determine whether the "river map" and "Luo Shu" recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty are lattice maps, it is necessary to seek the original records of the "river map" and "Luo Shu" in the literature of the pre Qin Dynasty. According to the original records of "river map" and "Luo Shu" in "Shang Shu Gu Diao", "the Analects of Confucius" and "Zhouyi", it is impossible to draw the conclusion that "river map", "Luo Shu" is the map of lattice. The conclusion of the non-lattice map is that according to Hu Ying-lin 's "eight methods of distinguishing forgeries", the theory of "nuclear amalgamation" is described as "river map", the "Luoshu" is suspicious, and the theory of "different times" of the nucleus is described as "river map". Liu Mu, in the preface of the Alphabet, describes himself as "taking the odd and even numbers of the earth and the earth." The plot of the point ", inadvertently, has revealed a false flaw." Qing Dynasty scholar Mao Qiling will Liu Mu as a false trace of the original inspection is very clear. In order to make the map of lattice created by Liu Mu important to the world, he took the map of the lattice as "river map" and "Luoshu", which completely accord with the general law of making false. The arguments held by those who insist that the river map and the Luo Shu are lattice maps are also specious. Therefore, the river map recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty, Luoshu is not the map of the lattice.
【作者单位】：天津师范大学历史文化学院
【分类号】：K206

【相似文献】