论隋唐(前期)对高句丽、渤海政策的展开与突厥因素
[Abstract]:From the establishment of Fenggong relationship between Sui Dynasty and Goguryo at the end of the 6th century AD to the end of the disputes between the Bohai Sea and the Bohai Sea at the beginning of the 8th century, it was a crucial period for Northeast Asia to gradually move from chaos to stability and from disordering to order. During the period of Kaiyuan period, the stable order frame of Northeast Asia was gradually established by the complex political-military game and the fusion of national culture. In this process, the Sui and Tang dynasties changed their policies toward Koguryo and Bohai Sea, and there were both peaceful exchanges and large-scale wars, during which there were always Turkic forces (including the pre-secession Turkic Empire, the Eastern Turkic Khan and the Post-Turkic Khan). These Turkic factors or direct military intervention, or hidden behind the Sui and Tang Dynasty's policy toward Koguryo, is worth exploring. In this paper, the Sui and Tang dynasties (the early period) to the policy of Gaogouli, Bohai and the underlying Turkic factors as the argument, the article is divided into the introduction, this theory and the conclusion of three parts, a total of five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. This paper mainly describes the domestic and foreign research trends related to this topic and the research ideas of this paper (research purpose and significance, research methods and innovation points), and provides the background for the text narration. The second chapter mainly expounds Sui Li's Turkic factors in Liaohe River Basin dispute. Firstly, the change of the situation in western Liaoning at the end of 6 th century is analyzed. Secondly, taking Sui, Koguryo and Turkic as the center, this paper analyzes Sui, Li, Turkic's contention for the forces of Kobongnin and Qidan, and Sui Wendi's intervention in Koguryo. Finally, taking the East Turkic of Koguryo back Sui Dynasty as the center, the paper discusses the problem of Koguryo emissary encountered by Emperor Yang in the East Turkic tooth account and the restraining effect of the Middle East Turkic on the Sui army in the process of the three Rebels of Koguryo. The third chapter mainly expounds the Turkic factors behind the relationship between Tang Dynasty and Koguryo. First of all, taking the change of the policy toward Goguryo in the early Tang Dynasty as the center, the paper analyzes the situation in Northeast Asia during the Sui and Tang dynasties and the factors of the East Turkic from the combination of the Tang Dynasty and Gaoguril to the introduction of the tough policy of the Tang Taizong. Secondly, the paper discusses the composition of the Turkic Tibetan troops in the Tang Li War, their performance in the battlefield of eastern Liaoning and their role in the process of killing Koguryo. The fourth chapter mainly expounds the influence of post-Turkic factors on the relationship between the Tang Dynasty and Bohai. Firstly, the situation of Northeast Asia and the revival of post-Turkic in the second half of the 7 th century are briefly described. Secondly, taking the transformation of Bohai policy in Zhou and Tang dynasties as the center, this paper analyzes the hostile relations of Tang Bo, the alliance between Da Zuo Rong and the post-Turkic, and the relaxation of the relations with the Bohai Sea under the background of the Turkic after the Tang Dynasty. Finally, the Tang and Bohai dissension dominated by Turkic-dominated later as the center, elaborated the post-Turkic, Qidan, Bohai Sea, Xi "four Fan Union" and the Tang Bo War and the post-war Tang Bo relations. Chapter five is the conclusion. This paper summarizes the expression of Turkic factors in the process of the policy of Koguryo and Bohai Sea in Sui and Tang dynasties and their effects on it under different circumstances.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K241
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苗威;试论隋与高句丽战争[J];延边大学学报(社会科学版);2000年03期
2 尹国有;高句丽的石文化[J];通化师范学院学报;2000年01期
3 耿铁华,秦升阳;高句丽历史课程建设的特色与价值[J];通化师范学院学报;2000年04期
4 林茂雨,李龙彬;高句丽民族的婚丧习俗及宗教信仰[J];北方文物;2002年03期
5 张福有;;高句丽文化的本质属性和思想渊源[J];学问;2003年12期
6 耿铁华;;《中国高句丽史》写作缘起[J];学问;2003年07期
7 张福有;;集通说之大成 夺创新之先声——《中国高句丽史》评析[J];学问;2003年07期
8 高於茂;;正本清源蔚为大观——《中国高句丽史》读后[J];学问;2003年07期
9 李德山;当前高句丽史研究中的几个问题[J];中国边疆史地研究;2003年02期
10 李大龙;高句丽史研究的又一部力作——《中国高句丽史》评介[J];中国边疆史地研究;2003年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 马彦;;高句丽政权灭亡与民族解体[A];朝鲜·韩国历史研究(第十辑)——中国朝鲜史研究会会刊[C];2008年
2 孙文范;;高句丽史的几个问题[A];少数民族史及史料研究(三)——中国近现代史史料学学会学术会议论文集[C];1998年
3 马一虹;;6、7世纪梲棬部族与高句丽关系考述[A];三条丝绸之路比较研究学术讨论会论文集[C];2001年
4 拜根兴;侯振兵;;论唐人对高句丽及高句丽遗民的认识[A];唐史论丛(第十三辑)[C];2011年
5 张春霞;;高句丽宗教的多元发展[A];中外关系史论丛第19辑——多元宗教文化视野下的中外关系史[C];2010年
6 王绵厚;;高句丽古城研究[A];辽宁省哲学社会科学获奖成果汇编(2003—2004年度)[C];2003年
7 孙泓;;公元3—5世纪东北亚诸民族·政权的关系研究——以高句丽中期历史为中心[A];中国朝鲜史研究会会刊——朝鲜·韩国历史研究(第十五辑)[C];2013年
8 耿铁华;;集安新发现的高句丽碑及其研究状况[A];中国朝鲜史研究会会刊——朝鲜·韩国历史研究(第十五辑)[C];2013年
9 楼正豪;;新见唐高句丽遗民《高牟墓志铭》考释[A];唐史论丛(第十八辑)[C];2014年
10 房奕;;高句丽向北魏遣使与相互关系的变迁[A];传统中国研究集刊(第一辑)[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 耿铁华;高句丽历史三大谜团[N];北京科技报;2004年
2 记者 谢晓林 王忠先;高句丽文化是中国的更是世界的[N];吉林日报;2004年
3 董学增;二十世纪高句丽古城研究的力作[N];中国文物报;2004年
4 董学增;《中国高句丽史》创新之处[N];中国文物报;2005年
5 邱振刚 余 宁;高句丽,中国又一个世界遗产[N];中国艺术报;2004年
6 苏秋罗;世界遗产高句丽[N];河南日报;2004年
7 记者 王强;纪念高句丽迁都国内城 (集安)2000周年暨第三届全国高句丽学术研讨会圆满结束[N];吉林日报;2003年
8 记者 马扬 周长庆 程云杰;高句丽古墓惊现中国最早八卦图实图[N];新华每日电讯;2004年
9 王文库 张士海;高句丽文化探源[N];本溪日报;2012年
10 杨春吉 耿铁华;我国东北历史上的高句丽政权[N];吉林日报;2000年
相关博士学位论文 前8条
1 李乐营;高句丽宗教信仰研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年
2 张士东;从高句丽语看高句丽与周边民族关系[D];吉林大学;2012年
3 吴珍锡;三燕文化及其与高句丽、朝鲜半岛南部诸国文化交流的考古学研究[D];吉林大学;2017年
4 熊义民;公元四至七世纪东北亚政治关系史研究[D];暨南大学;2003年
5 黄龙顺;高句丽古墓壁画与敦煌莫高窟壁画的比较研究[D];延边大学;2014年
6 李大龙;《三国史记·高句丽本纪》研究[D];中央民族大学;2009年
7 郑春颖;高句丽遗存所见服饰研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
8 郑元U,
本文编号:2353978
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2353978.html