论汉代《左传》的两大传本及其显晦
发布时间：2018-12-17 13:51
【摘要】：《左传》存在着民间传本与秘府藏本两种系统。两种系统之间应当存在着较大的差异。民间传本有不少的残缺部分。一些学者认为今本《左传》之前有一个完整的“原本”。秘府藏本因刘歆的努力而立于学官,始显于世。刘歆《左传》学派是新莽之后整个东汉《左传》学的主干。这个主导地位最终导致了《左传》秘府藏本的通行和民间传本的晦没。贾谊一系民间传本在陈元做了一番带有总结性的工作后,遂至浸微。《左传》的两种系统就其初始而言,都属古文本。然而其趋势则是今文转写本渐渐增多,因为只有多以今文转写方能较大规模地流行民间。古文本《左传》当消亡于唐宋之际。
[Abstract]:There are two systems of folk biography and secret house collection. There should be great differences between the two systems. There are many incomplete parts in the folklore. Some scholars believe that there is a complete original before this Zuo Zhuan. Secret House Tibetan because of Liu Xin's efforts and stand in the school officials, before the world. Liu Xin Zuo Zhuan School was the backbone of the whole Eastern Han Dynasty. This dominant position eventually led to the passage of secret collections and the obscurity of folk biographies. After Chen Yuan had done some summative work, the two systems of "Zuo Zhuan" were ancient texts. However, the trend is that the number of today's manuscripts is increasing, because only more of them can be popular among the folk on a large scale. The ancient text Zuo Zhuan died out in the Tang and Song dynasties.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学文学院
【分类号】：K204
[Abstract]:There are two systems of folk biography and secret house collection. There should be great differences between the two systems. There are many incomplete parts in the folklore. Some scholars believe that there is a complete original before this Zuo Zhuan. Secret House Tibetan because of Liu Xin's efforts and stand in the school officials, before the world. Liu Xin Zuo Zhuan School was the backbone of the whole Eastern Han Dynasty. This dominant position eventually led to the passage of secret collections and the obscurity of folk biographies. After Chen Yuan had done some summative work, the two systems of "Zuo Zhuan" were ancient texts. However, the trend is that the number of today's manuscripts is increasing, because only more of them can be popular among the folk on a large scale. The ancient text Zuo Zhuan died out in the Tang and Song dynasties.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学文学院
【分类号】：K204
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前2条
1 常金仓;;《穆天子传》的时代和文献性质[A];周秦社会与文化研究——纪念中国先秦史学会成立20周年学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
2 王俊潮;杨定;;蜚”、“，
本文编号：2384282
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2384282.html
