两岸《洪范》学比较研究（1949-2011）

发布时间：2019-05-07 19:18

【摘要】：《洪范》篇因系统阐述了古代帝王治理国家的原则和方法而受到世人的推崇，历朝历代研习者甚繁，是《尚书》中被研究得最早、研究得最多的篇章，但其相关研究至今并非了无疑窦。随着出土文献的发掘、多学科交叉研究方法等新资料、新方法的运用，《洪范》学研究日趋呈现多角度、多层次的发展方向，1949年之后两岸关系从最开始的冰冻走向逐渐融合，两岸各种交流合作有序开展，国家“十二五”规划中又明确提出要弘扬优秀传统文化，现对建国之后两岸《洪范》学研究成果作一比较研究，必将利于两岸学术文化交流，利于传统文化的传承，更利于今后的《洪范》学取得更新的研究成果。 1949—2011年间两岸出版的《洪范》学研究成果非常杂乱，急需系统整理，按照年代的跨度来看，主要分为三个历史时期，即八十年代之前的两岸《洪范》学研究成果、八十年代至新世纪之前的两岸《洪范》学研究成果与新世纪以来的两岸《洪范》学研究成果。通过全面系统地梳理分析1949-2011年间两岸出版的《洪范》学研究成果，两岸《洪范》学研究在三个历史时期的差异性显而易见，六十余年来两岸《洪范》学研究的整体异同亦得到了概括总结。八十年代之前的两岸《洪范》学研究以台湾研究为主，无论是《洪范》研究成果、研究学者还是研究内容，台湾都明显优于大陆。八十年代至新世纪之前的两岸《洪范》学研究开始以大陆研究为主，大陆的《洪范》研究成果与研究学者的数量明显增多，研究内容更是实现了历史上的突破，新增了《洪范》学史研究领域，开辟了《洪范》学研究的新天地，，此时台湾《洪范》学研究仍沿袭传统研究领域，未有实质性的突破。新世纪以来的两岸《洪范》学研究，大陆更是占据了主导地位，《洪范》研究成果与研究学者数量稳步上升，研究内容较之以前又有了新的发展，学者们开始将《洪范》与其他学科联系起来进行研究，用联系的眼光去探究《洪范》学，此时台湾《洪范》学研究严重萎缩，仅3项《洪范》学研究成果，仅涉及《洪范》文本研究，研究范围明显缩小。建国至今六十余年来，两岸《洪范》学研究以八十年代为重要拐点，两岸《洪范》研究成果、研究学者以及研究内容在八十年代前后呈现明显不同的发展态势，大陆研究在八十年代之后快速发展，台湾研究在八十年代之后逐渐消沉，透过这一时期的两岸《洪范》学研究比较可知，《洪范》学研究要想有序地发展下去，必须要建立一支薪火相传的《洪范》学研究学术梯队，构建一个开放自由的《洪范》学沟通平台，创建一套科学合理的《洪范》学研究体系。综上所述，《洪范》学涉及政治、经济、哲学、科学、天文、历法等我国古代社会生活领域的方方面面，继续深入挖掘其现世的学术价值具有非常重大的意义。比较研究1949年之后的两岸《洪范》学研究成果，不仅可以系统梳理六十余年来两岸《洪范》学研究的嬗变轨迹，更能明确现今《洪范》学研究的不足与优劣，为《洪范》学研究体系的建设与完善贡献一份绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:It is the first and most important chapter in the study to study the principles and methods of the ancient emperor's governing state by the system, which is the first to be studied in the Book of History, but the relevant research is not in doubt. With the excavation of the unearthed literature, the application of new methods, such as the method of multi-disciplinary cross-study and the application of the new method, the study of "Hongfan> study is more and more multi-angle and multi-level development direction. After 1949, the cross-Straits relations are gradually integrated from the beginning of the freezing trend, and the exchanges and cooperation between the two sides will be carried out in an orderly way." In that national "12th Five-Year" plan, it is clear that it is necessary to carry forward the excellent traditional culture, and to make a comparative study on the research results of the two sides of the two sides of the country after the founding of the country, which will be conducive to the cultural exchange between the two sides and to the inheritance of the traditional culture. It is more beneficial to the future research results of the study. During the period of 1949 to 2011, the research results of the two sides of the two sides of the two sides were very messy and urgent, and the system was urgently needed. According to the span of the time, it was divided into three historical periods, that is, the two sides of the two sides before the 1980 's. The results of the study on the cross-strait relations between the 1980 's and the new century and the cross-strait relations since the new century Based on the comprehensive and systematic analysis of the research results of the two cross-strait publications, the difference between the two sides on the two sides of the study of the "Hongfan> study" in the three historical periods is obvious, and the overall similarities and differences between the two sides of the two sides on both sides of the two sides of the two sides have been made. The study of the two cross-strait relations before the 1980 's is based on the study of the Taiwan, whether it is the study of Hong Fan> the research results, the research scholars and the research contents, and the Taiwan is obviously excellent. On the mainland, the study on the cross-strait relations between the 1980 's and the new century began to study mainly on the mainland, and the research results of the "Hong Fan" and the research scholars in the mainland increased significantly, and the research content was a breakthrough in history. In the field of research, the new world of the study of "Hongfan> study has been opened. At this time, the study of" Hongfan> study in Taiwan still follows the traditional research field, and has not been substantial. " In the new century, the study on the cross-strait relations between the two sides has dominated the study, and the number of research and research scholars has steadily increased, and the content of the research has a new development compared with that of the former, and the scholars began to associate with other subjects. The study of the line of the study, with the view of the contact, the study of the study, at this time, Taiwan study serious atrophy, only 3 of the study research results, only to the text research, the study scope is clear Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, since the founding of the People's Republic of China for more than 60 years, the study of the two sides of the two sides has become an important turning point in the 1980 's. The research results of the two sides of the two sides of the People's Republic of China, the research scholars and the contents of the study show a distinct development trend in the 1980s and after the 1980s. After the rapid development of the post-1980s, the Taiwan study was gradually depressed after the 1980 's. Through the comparison between the two sides of the two sides of the period, the study of the two sides on both sides of the two sides of the study shows that the study of the "Hong Fan> study should be developed in an orderly way, and it is necessary to establish a one-year-old one." To study the academic ladder, to build an open and free learning communication platform, and to create a scientific and reasonable set of To sum up, to sum up, study all aspects of the ancient social life of China, such as politics, economy, philosophy, science, astronomy, and calendar, and continue to tap into the academic value of its present world. It is of great significance to compare the research results of the two cross-strait relations after 1949, not only can the system be combed for more than 60 years, the development of the cross-strait relations between the two sides of the two sides is more clear than that of the study. The shortcomings and disadvantages of the study are the construction and improvement of the study system of the study system.
【学位授予单位】：曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：K221.04

【参考文献】