唐后期政治博弈对族群认同的影响
发布时间：2019-05-12 15:26
【摘要】："安史之乱"爆发后,朝廷与地方势力展开了一系列政治博弈,对唐帝国的族群认同产生了颠覆性的影响。肃宗以降,朝廷围绕文化而设计的博弈战略冲击了唐前期"夷夏一家"的族群认同理念,进一步造成"夷夏之防"意识的强化,并促使族群认同产生质变。"会昌灭佛"实际上是政治博弈的产物,它标志着唐代夷夏一家族群理念的结束。唐后期政治博弈对帝国族群认同的影响既深且远,由此产生的夷夏之防意识也不时困扰中国士人,直到近百年来才逐渐缓解。
[Abstract]:After the outbreak of Anshi chaos, the court and local forces launched a series of political games, which had a subversive impact on the ethnic identity of the Tang Empire. The game strategy designed by the court around culture impacted the concept of ethnic identity in the early Tang Dynasty, which further strengthened the consciousness of "prevention of Yi and Xia", and promoted the qualitative change of ethnic identity. " Huichang destroy Buddha is actually the product of political game, which marks the end of the idea of an ethnic group in Yixia in Tang Dynasty. In the late Tang Dynasty, the influence of the political game on the ethnic identity of the empire was deep and far, and the consciousness of preventing the Yi Xia from time to time perplexed the Chinese scholars from time to time, and it was not gradually alleviated until nearly a hundred years ago.
【作者单位】： 北京大学历史学系;
【分类号】：K242
本文编号：2475483
[Abstract]:After the outbreak of Anshi chaos, the court and local forces launched a series of political games, which had a subversive impact on the ethnic identity of the Tang Empire. The game strategy designed by the court around culture impacted the concept of ethnic identity in the early Tang Dynasty, which further strengthened the consciousness of "prevention of Yi and Xia", and promoted the qualitative change of ethnic identity. " Huichang destroy Buddha is actually the product of political game, which marks the end of the idea of an ethnic group in Yixia in Tang Dynasty. In the late Tang Dynasty, the influence of the political game on the ethnic identity of the empire was deep and far, and the consciousness of preventing the Yi Xia from time to time perplexed the Chinese scholars from time to time, and it was not gradually alleviated until nearly a hundred years ago.
【作者单位】： 北京大学历史学系;
【分类号】：K242
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 魏孝稷;;族群互动与族群认同的文化转向:以古典时期中国与希腊为中心的比较[J];全球史评论;2012年00期
2 陈志坚;;“越为禹后”说新论[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
，本文编号：2475483
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2475483.html
