秦汉诉讼制度中的“覆”及相关问题
发布时间：2019-05-27 09:52
【摘要】："覆"是秦汉诉讼制度中的重要概念。以往学者多采纳沈家本"重审察"的解释。通过对传世文献与出土材料的考察,可发现"覆"不仅用于二审、重审、再审案件,亦用于一审案件,因此不宜将"覆"定义为"重审察"。目前所见"覆"的案例一般为上级机关主理或由上级机关指定某机构(或使者)主理的案件,主理的程序包括立案、侦查、审判、复核、监督等各个环节。在此基础上亦可进一步考察秦汉文献中"复""复案""覆讯"的含义。秦汉时期诉讼制度中"覆"程序的存在,反映了当时司法体系和诉讼程序的复杂以及审级制度的发展。
[Abstract]:Fu is an important concept in the litigation system of Qin and Han dynasties. In the past, scholars mostly adopted the explanation of Shen Jiaben's reexamination. Through the investigation of the handed down literature and unearthed materials, it can be found that "retrial" is not only used in the second trial, retrial and retrial, but also in the first instance, so it is not appropriate to define "retrial" as "retrial". At present, the cases of "reply" are generally cases in charge of a higher organ or designated by a higher organ (or emissary). The procedure of the master includes filing, investigation, trial, review, supervision and so on. On this basis, we can further investigate the meaning of "reply" and "reply" in Qin and Han documents. The existence of "reply" procedure in the litigation system in Qin and Han dynasties reflects the complexity of the judicial system and procedure at that time and the development of the trial level system.
【作者单位】： 南开大学历史学院;南开大学中国社会史研究中心;中国人民大学国学院博士后流动站;
【分类号】：K232
，
本文编号：2486054
[Abstract]:Fu is an important concept in the litigation system of Qin and Han dynasties. In the past, scholars mostly adopted the explanation of Shen Jiaben's reexamination. Through the investigation of the handed down literature and unearthed materials, it can be found that "retrial" is not only used in the second trial, retrial and retrial, but also in the first instance, so it is not appropriate to define "retrial" as "retrial". At present, the cases of "reply" are generally cases in charge of a higher organ or designated by a higher organ (or emissary). The procedure of the master includes filing, investigation, trial, review, supervision and so on. On this basis, we can further investigate the meaning of "reply" and "reply" in Qin and Han documents. The existence of "reply" procedure in the litigation system in Qin and Han dynasties reflects the complexity of the judicial system and procedure at that time and the development of the trial level system.
【作者单位】： 南开大学历史学院;南开大学中国社会史研究中心;中国人民大学国学院博士后流动站;
【分类号】：K232
，
本文编号：2486054
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2486054.html
