国有出版企业混合所有制改革研究
本文选题:国有出版企业 + 混合所有制 ; 参考:《华中师范大学》2017年博士论文
【摘要】:2003年全国文化体制改革试点工作正式启动,截止到2010年,经营性出版社基本完成转企改制,成为独立的市场主体——国有出版企业。在转企改制过程中,不少出版社敢当改革的先锋者,通过与民营书业合资成立公司、与骨干员工合资成立公司以及向非公有制企业投资等方式,取得了诸多成效,这些改革实质上就是混合所有制改革。十八届三中全会上,混合所有制改革被提升到我国基本经济制度重要实现形式的高度,但从出版业的整体情况来看,国有出版企业对这一改革举措的反应相对迟缓。这与前期业内外混合所有制改革中出现的诸多问题有着很大的关系。发现这些问题,找出解决问题的对策,将对国有出版企业混合所有制改革的深化产生重要作用。本文以拥有国务院出版行政主管部门授予的出版权、以图书出版为主业的国有出版企业的混合所有制改革为研究对象,坚持马克思主义基本原理和精神,运用历史唯物论的方法、观察法、跨学科研究方法、文献研究方法、系统分析方法等,系统梳理国内外相关领域的研究成果,在此基础上对我国混合所有制改革的指导思想——马克思主义混合所有制思想进行研究,构建了论文分析的理论框架和基础,然后探究了国有出版企业混合所有制改革的现状与存在的主要问题,提出了适合于我国国有出版企业实际的不同性质所有制“混合”的路径与方式,并对如何防范国有出版企业混合所有制改革中的主要风险即国有资产流失风险和出版产品质量风险,以及如何通过完善公司治理来保障混合所有制出版企业可持续发展给出了诸多可行性对策。混合所有制改革是生产关系领域的一场变革,对于这场变革,无论是出版界还是其他行业领域,都存有忧虑,担心改革会使中国经济偏离社会主义性质,担心改革会偏离马克思主义的航道。虽然当前对混合所有制改革进行研究的文献颇丰,但多为一种浅层分析,少有文献对我国混合所有制改革的指导思想——马克思主义混合所有制思想进行深入探讨。本文的研究首先就要解除国有出版企业发展混合所有制的思想困惑,故从理论基础、基本内容、当代价值三方面对马克思主义混合所有制思想进行了深层探究,并分析了马克思主义混合所有制思想与西方混合经济理论的联系与本质区别,从而论证了我国当前进行的混合所有制改革有着坚实的马克思主义理论依据。国有出版企业不仅具有产业属性,还具有意识形态属性。这就决定了国有出版企业的混合所有制改革必须正视这一特殊性来进行相关的制度设计与创新。对于国有出版企业混合所有制的实现问题,本文给出了详细的路径规划:出版权控制环节的“混合”禁区、精神内容制作环节国有股的绝对控股、发行环节的特殊管理股设置、印刷环节“混合”的相对自由。同时,本文认为如果国有出版企业能够选择科学的混合所有制改革路径,那么改革中的国有资产流失风险、出版产品质量风险都是可控的,改革企业也能够通过完善公司治理来实现可持续发展,并给出了具体的对策性建议。
[Abstract]:In 2003, the pilot work of the national cultural system reform was officially launched. By 2010, the operating publishing house has basically completed the transformation of enterprises and became an independent market subject - the state-owned publishing enterprise. In the process of transforming enterprises into enterprises, many publishers dare to be the pioneer of the reform and joint venture with the people's books industry to establish joint ventures with the backbone employees. A lot of achievements have been achieved in the ways of establishing companies and investing in non-public enterprises. These reforms are essentially mixed ownership reform. In the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the reform of the mixed ownership system was promoted to the important realization form of the basic economic system in China. However, from the overall situation of the publishing industry, the state-owned publishing enterprises have made this one. The response of the reform measures is relatively slow. It has a great relationship with many problems arising from the early industrial and external mixed ownership reform. Finding these problems and finding out the countermeasures to solve the problems will play an important role in the deepening of the reform of the mixed ownership system of the state-owned publishing enterprises. This article is granted by the Department of the State Council. It is the subject of the study of the reform of the mixed ownership of the state-owned publishing enterprises with the publication of books as the main industry, adhering to the basic principles and spirit of Marx doctrine, using the methods of historical materialism, observation, interdisciplinary research, literature research, and systematic analysis, and systematically combing the research results in the related fields both at home and abroad. On the basis of the guiding ideology of the reform of the mixed ownership system in China, Marx's thought of mixed ownership, the theoretical framework and foundation of the analysis of the paper are constructed, and then the current situation and main problems of the reform of the mixed ownership system of the state-owned publishing enterprises are explored, and the actual situation of the state-owned publishing enterprises in China is put forward. With the way and way of "mixing" with property ownership, and how to guard against the main risks in the reform of the mixed ownership of the state-owned publishing enterprises, namely the risk of the loss of state assets and the risk of publishing product quality, and how to guarantee the sustainable development of the mixed ownership Publishing Enterprises by perfecting the corporate governance, many feasible countermeasures are given. The reform of the mixed ownership system is a change in the field of production relations. There are worries about this change, both in the publishing and other sectors of the industry, that the reform will make the Chinese economy deviate from the socialist nature and fear that the reform will deviate from the Marx's channel. But most of them are a kind of shallow analysis. There are few literature on the guiding ideology of the reform of the mixed ownership system in China - the thought of Marx's mixed ownership. The study of this paper is the first to dissolve the ideological confusion of the development of the mixed ownership of the state-owned publishing enterprises, so it is the three aspects of the horse from the basis of theory, the basic content and the contemporary value. The thought of Kyth's mixed ownership is deeply explored, and the difference between the thought of Marx's mixed ownership and the western mixed economy theory is analyzed. Thus, it is demonstrated that the current reform of the mixed ownership system in China has a solid basis for the theory of Marx doctrine. It also has the attribute of ideology. This determines that the reform of the mixed ownership of the state-owned publishing enterprises must face the particularity to carry out the relevant system design and innovation. The detailed path planning is given for the realization of the mixed ownership of the state-owned publishing enterprises, the "mixed" area of the publishing right control link, the spiritual content. At the same time, this paper holds that if the state-owned publishing enterprises can choose the scientific mixed ownership reform path, the risk of the loss of state-owned assets in the reform and the quality risk of the published products are controlled. The industry can also achieve sustainable development by improving corporate governance, and gives concrete countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G239.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侍超;;有关国有混合所有制企业公司治理弊端之我见[J];财会学习;2017年02期
2 李克明;冷桥勋;;大学出版践行马克思主义新闻出版观的路径选择[J];现代出版;2016年06期
3 靳琼;陆嘉琦;;保障图书质量的关键在于管理[J];中国编辑;2016年05期
4 何青;;浅论混合所有制下企业国有资产监管[J];商业会计;2016年10期
5 段维;谢琴;;论“互联网+”时代出版业的走向[J];中国编辑;2016年03期
6 吴倩楠;卓盛鸿;;国有企业混合所有制改革理论逻辑与模式比较[J];企业技术开发;2016年12期
7 王新红;;《企业国有资产法》若干法律问题初探[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年01期
8 张敏;;论混合所有制企业公司治理的特殊性[J];青海社会科学;2015年06期
9 ;改革国有资产监管体制——关于打造一流国有资本运营平台的建议[J];浦东开发;2015年11期
10 张素梅;;坚持马克思主义新闻出版观 做好编辑出版工作[J];求知;2015年11期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 谢军;中国混合所有制企业国有产权管理研究[D];武汉理工大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 王曼茹;中国化的马克思主义混合所有制经济思想研究[D];扬州大学;2016年
2 邹硕;国有企业混合所有制改革对策研究[D];湖北工业大学;2016年
3 张国骁;国有企业混合所有制改革研究[D];河南大学;2015年
4 贾寒;论出版权特许经营下的制作和出版分开[D];中央民族大学;2015年
5 张晓雷;马克思主义哲学视野下的混合所有制经济[D];淮北师范大学;2010年
6 钟长明;我国混合所有制生成和发展研究[D];南昌大学;2009年
7 杨宁;混合所有制经济的哲学透视[D];新疆大学;2005年
8 周玉红;国有企业员工持股制度与“重建个人所有制”[D];天津师范大学;2001年
,本文编号:1788826
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/xxkjbs/1788826.html