基于响应面的复杂黑箱模型优化算法研究
[Abstract]:Nowadays, when designing complex mechanical systems, it is often necessary to establish a computer simulation model of the system and adjust the relevant parameters of the system based on the simulation analysis model so as to achieve a better performance level. The relationship between the objective and constraints of the problem and the design variables can not be expressed explicitly. In the process of optimization iteration, the objective or constraints need to call the simulation model to perform a computational analysis for each evaluation. This computational simulation model is a black box model for engineers. The accuracy of the auxiliary analysis model is higher and higher, so the computational time of the simulation model is longer and longer. Although the computational capacity of the computer has been greatly improved compared with the previous, the whole optimization process takes too long to solve some complex and high fidelity simulation model parameters optimization problems. In order to reduce the computational cost, the optimization theory based on response surface model (RSM) emerged and has been developed and perfected in the past 20 years. It has been widely used by engineers in aerospace, vehicle engineering, chemical engineering, marine engineering, mechanical engineering, biology and many other fields. Methods By establishing the approximate mathematical expression of the original complex black box model in the optimization process and allocating computing resources reasonably, the number of real simulation analysis ("expensive valuation") is minimized, and the approximate mathematical model is used instead of the simulation model as much as possible to solve the calculation ("cheap valuation") in order to reduce the whole optimization process. Response surface model describes the approximate functional relationship between input variables and output responses of the simulation model. The construction process is to obtain a series of data sampling points through experimental design method, and then to simulate the sampling points to get the corresponding output response values, thus establishing the input-output functional relationship. On the basis of the existing response surface model, the optimization of response surface needs to balance the spatial exploration of the unknown area with the analysis and sampling of the optimal value area of the response surface model, and allocate the computational cost reasonably to determine the iterative point in the search process. In this paper, a series of research and exploration are carried out on unconstrained optimization, constrained optimization, mixed integer optimization and multi-objective optimization problems. The main research contents can be summarized as follows: (1) Several commonly used response surface models are analyzed. Aiming at the current situation that most of the response surface model optimization methods are based on a single response surface model, the AMGO (Adaptive Metamodel-based Global Optimization) algorithm is proposed. In the optimization process, the hybrid response surface model is used to approximate the simulation model to combine multiple responses. In this algorithm, considering that the search iteration not only needs to sample and analyze the region near the optimal value of the current response surface model, but also needs to explore the region which has not been explored yet, a new iterative point selection strategy is proposed, which can be used to a certain extent. This paper compares the AMGO algorithm with three representative response surface optimization methods to verify the validity of the proposed algorithm, and then applies it to the optimization design of the internal meshing rotor pump, which effectively improves the flow characteristics of the rotor pump. (2) To solve the problem of black box function optimization with complex constraints, a constrained optimization method based on response surface model (RSM) is proposed. This method establishes an approximate response surface model for both the black box objective function and each black box constraint function, instead of simply using penalty function method to deal with the problem, avoiding improper selection of penalty factors and severe approximate penalty function. The algorithm is divided into two stages: the first stage is to search an initial feasible solution by using the existing data information when the initial sampling point is not feasible; the second stage is to search for a better design point on the basis of the existing initial feasible point. The algorithm does not require the designer to provide feasible initial points at the beginning of the algorithm, and uses the gradient information of the objective and constraint function response surface model to approximate the constraint correction of iteration points which violate less constraint degree in the search process, in order to obtain more feasible points with less computational cost. (3) The response surface based method is analyzed. The advantages of the optimization method in solving mixed integer optimization problems based on simulation models are discussed. The subdivision rectangle algorithm is extended and combined with the response surface optimization (RSO) method, METADIR algorithm (METAmodel and DIRect method) is proposed. Potential optimal subspace is used to analyze the aggregation degree of data points in the optimal subspace. When the density reaches a certain threshold, the subdivision process of the design domain is terminated, and a local response surface model is established in the current optimal subspace. Then the original mixed integer optimization problem is solved by the response surface optimization method. (4) Based on the detailed analysis and discussion of Kriging model, Kriging response surface model is combined with particle swarm optimization to solve the problem of multi-objective black box function optimization. The presupposition information of multi-objective problem makes it popular among many designers. However, the number of simulations required in the iteration process of particle swarm optimization is too many to fall into local optimum, which limits its application in simulation optimization problems. The Kriging response surface set is constructed to approximate the function between the original simulation model and the design variables. Then, by solving the multi-objective problem based on the approximate model and using its non-dominated solution to guide the updating of the particle population, the global searching ability of the algorithm is improved. Determine which particles need expensive valuation, and the remaining particles can be estimated by response surface method, so as to greatly reduce the computational cost of the algorithm. (5) Based on MDesigner, the integration of MDesigner and MATLAB is realized by using MATLAB engine technology and mex application program interface. Based on the technology of MATLAB engine and mex application program interface, the MDesigner platform can directly invoke the response surface optimization algorithm under the environment of MATLAB. Finally, through the optimization design of gearbox, the whole process of response surface optimization under the MDesigner platform is demonstrated, which effectively demonstrates the effectiveness of the method and the wide application of the platform. Finally, the research of this paper is summarized, and the future work and research are prospected, and the future research hotspots and trends based on response surface optimization method are discussed.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:TP18
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 潘雷;谷良贤;;分块响应面法研究[J];计算机工程与应用;2009年19期
2 李恩颖;李光耀;王琥;;混合响应面法对汽车吸能部件优化关键技术[J];计算机应用研究;2008年02期
3 王琥;李光耀;李恩颖;韩旭;;基于响应面法的汽车吸能部件优化问题研究[J];系统仿真学报;2007年16期
4 王娅;谷正气;李伟平;梁小波;彭国谱;;基于响应面方法的某智能SUV平顺性优化[J];机械科学与技术;2010年03期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杜家政;阳志光;隋允康;龙连春;;基于响应面法的三心底结构形状优化[A];北京力学学会第12届学术年会论文摘要集[C];2006年
2 杜家政;隋允康;龙连春;;基于响应面法的五心底结构形状优化[A];北京力学会第14届学术年会论文集[C];2008年
3 王正平;龙腾;刘莉;;多学科设计优化中的多项式响应面近似方法研究[A];第八届全国信息获取与处理学术会议论文集[C];2010年
4 宇慧平;隋允康;张轩;龙连春;;响应面方法的改进[A];北京力学会第13届学术年会论文集[C];2007年
5 张立新;隋允康;;基于响应面方法的桁架截面优化[A];北京力学会第11届学术年会论文摘要集[C];2005年
6 许英;;基于变f序列响应面法的边坡稳定可靠性分析[A];第四届全国船舶与海洋工程学术会议论文集[C];2009年
7 唐乃梅;隋允康;;基于响应面法的膜结构的截面优化[A];中国力学学会学术大会'2005论文摘要集(下)[C];2005年
8 张轩;隋允康;;改进的响应面方法及其在形状优化中的应用[A];北京力学会第11届学术年会论文摘要集[C];2005年
9 陈华斌;任伟新;;基于响应面的结构有限元模型修正[A];第15届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第Ⅰ册)[C];2006年
10 李善坡;隋允康;;采用组合响应面方法优化爆炸分离装置装药腔形状[A];北京力学会第13届学术年会论文集[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 揭皓翔;基于响应面的复杂黑箱模型优化算法研究[D];华中科技大学;2016年
2 Chau Minh Quang(周明光);基于径向基函数的结构可靠性分析算法研究[D];湖南大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 马迪;粒子群响应面建模法在ASPEN多因素优化中的应用[D];太原理工大学;2016年
2 路成;基于耦合失效多重响应面的结构可靠性分析方法研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2016年
3 纪祥飞;基于多元有理函数的结构响应面方法研究[D];山东理工大学;2016年
4 宋鲁凯;基于智能响应面法的机械可靠性优化设计研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2016年
5 刘令君;航空发动机整体叶盘可靠性优化设计[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2016年
6 王丽丽;转子系统复杂动态特性的响应面法研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2016年
7 贾磊;基于响应面的结构多失效模式可靠性分析[D];沈阳航空航天大学;2014年
8 刘靖雅;基于多重响应面法的结构可靠性优化设计[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2015年
9 赵洁;机械可靠性分析的响应面法研究[D];西北工业大学;2006年
10 王永菲;响应面法的数值方法研究及其在悬挂参数优化中的应用[D];中央民族大学;2006年
,本文编号:2179947
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/xxkjbs/2179947.html