《万历野获编》“金瓶梅”条真伪补证

发布时间：2018-01-01 17:21

本文关键词：《万历野获编》“金瓶梅”条真伪补证　出处：《中国典籍与文化》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：万历野获编》"金瓶梅"条包含了丰富的《金瓶梅》早期流传信息,是《金瓶梅》文献研究的重要出发点。笔者通过梳理《万历野获编》版本系统,认为"金瓶梅"条最早见于钱枋重编的台湾傅斯年图书馆藏陈奕禧校阅钞本。此条很可能是钱枋"割裂排缵"、分门类编时窜入,并非《万历野获编》原编原貌,有《顾曲杂言》传承系统作为旁证。但现有文献无法否定沈德符对"金瓶梅"条的著作权,其写作时间应迟至天启、崇祯年间。
[Abstract]:Wanliye was compiled > Jinpingmei, which contains abundant information about the early circulation of Jinping Mei, is the important starting point of the literature research on Jinpingmei. The author combs the edition system of Wanliye. It is believed that "Jin Ping Mei" was first found in Chen Yixi's banknote book collected by Taiwan's Fu Sinian Library, which was recompiled by Qian Fang. It is not that Wanliye was compiled in the original form, but the inheritance system of "Gu qu miscellaneous words" is used as circumstantial evidence. However, the existing literature cannot deny Shen Defu's copyright in "Jin Ping Mei", whose writing time should be later than the years of apocalypse and Chongzhen.
【作者单位】：北京大学中文系;
【分类号】：G256
【正文快照】： 《万历野获编》卷二五“金瓶梅”条历来为研究《金瓶梅》者所重视。鲁迅在《中国小说史略》里据此论《金瓶梅》的早期传钞过程及影射对象。此后,古典小说研究者在讨论相关问题时都绕不过这条材料。本文试图从版本文献角度为“金瓶梅”条的真伪问题提出补证。为了论述方便,兹将

【相似文献】