图书馆学研究中的本质主义与反本质主义论评

发布时间：2018-03-01 14:04

  本文关键词： 本质主义 反本质主义 图书馆学 中国　出处：《图书馆理论与实践》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在我国图书馆学界,目前出现了本质主义与反本质主义之争。图书馆学研究中的本质主义传统渊源流长,其基本表现是"现象—本质"二元分离观,认为图书馆现象背后隐藏着本质,这是将图书馆本质客观化和对象化的传统思维方式。反本质主义则依据现象学和后现代主义思想,认为图书馆本质与其说是"现象背后"隐藏着的某种神秘东西,毋宁说是对图书馆现象的直面认识和实践过程中自然显现出来的应然性东西。反本质主义反对通过设定"现象背后有本质"的预设性逻辑去抽象出图书馆本质的思想方法,同时反对热衷于图书馆本质探讨的学术生态。本质主义与反本质主义是两种不同的学术范式,两者应该在保持对话的学术伦理中共存。文章通过西方哲学思想和中国本土思想资源相结合的方法,对本质主义与反本质主义观点进行了较全面的评论。
[Abstract]:At present, there is a dispute between essentialism and anti-essentialism in the academic circle of libraries in China. The traditional origin of essentialism in library science research is long, and its basic manifestation is the dual separation view of "phenomenon-essence". It is believed that the essence of library is hidden behind it, which is the traditional thinking mode of objectifying and objectifying the nature of library, while anti-essentialism is based on phenomenology and postmodernism. Thinking that the nature of a library is not so much a mysterious thing as "behind the phenomenon", Rather, it is something that naturally appears in the process of cognition and practice of library phenomenon. Anti-essentialism opposes abstracting the thought method of library essence by setting up the presupposition logic of "the essence behind the phenomenon". At the same time, it opposes the academic ecology which is keen on the nature of library. Essentialism and anti-essentialism are two different academic paradigms. Both should coexist in the academic ethics of maintaining dialogue. This paper makes a comprehensive comment on essentialism and anti-essentialism through the combination of western philosophical thoughts and Chinese native ideological resources.
【作者单位】： 黑龙江大学图书馆;
【分类号】：G250
，

本文编号：1552227