五祀之井行考——兼论陈立《白虎通疏证》“井行一也”说

发布时间：2018-03-21 23:00

  本文选题：五祀　切入点：行祀　出处：《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："五祀"在传世文献中多有提及,然具体所指聚讼不一。行井之争成为争论焦点。行祀非道祭,乃祭院门内甬道也。行祀于汉代为井祀所取代,究其原因有二:井行一也。井、行在上古音近形似义通;井是行之重点,井祀与行祀目的一致。井为时祭二也。天上井宿主水衡,地下井祀祈水衡;汉代制礼少有依从,多无定制,故更为井祀;高祖匿于井中,躲避追兵,井为福佑汉家之祥物,故井祀始于汉;井走进寻常人家,贴近民生,祭井成必然。综此二因,必会导致井祀代替行祀之结果。
[Abstract]:The "five sacrifices" are often mentioned in the ancient literature, but the specific references are different. The dispute over walking wells has become the focus of argument. The conduct of worship is not Taoist sacrifice, it is also the corridor in the gate of the sacrificial temple. In the Han Dynasty, the sacrifice was replaced by the well worship. There are two reasons for this: well walking is also a well, well is a well. The well is the focus of the line, and the purpose of the well worship is the same. The well is the second place of sacrifice. The host of the well in the sky, the underground well worship, pray for the water balance; in the Han Dynasty, there is little compliance and no customization, so it is more of a well sacrifice. Gaozu hid himself in the well, avoiding the pursuit of soldiers, and the well was a blessing for the Han family. Therefore, the well worship began in the Han Dynasty; when the well entered the common people, it became inevitable to sacrifice the well to the people's livelihood. In summary, these two reasons will inevitably lead to the result of the well sacrifice instead of the traveling sacrifice.
【作者单位】： 东北师范大学文学院;吉林动画学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“《孔丛子》研究”(项目编号:12YJA751012)
【分类号】：G256
，

本文编号：1645922