《四库全书总目》对朱子经学的评价及其学术立场

发布时间：2018-03-26 15:01

本文选题：四库全书总目　切入点：朱子之学　出处：《图书馆工作与研究》2017年08期

【摘要】：学术界一般认为《四库全书总目》对朱熹的评价是以批判为主。通过梳理与分析《四库全书总目》对朱熹论著及学术观点的评价可以发现,《四库全书总目》主要是对朱子《周易本义》采用图书之说及卦变之说、《诗集传》舍序言《诗》等持完全否定态度,而对朱熹在《尚书》学、《春秋》学、三礼学、《四书》学等方面的论述从学术上讲则基本赞同。《四库全书总目》对朱子之学的评价,从思想上讲,是以清高宗御纂钦定经学著作为标准;从学术上讲,是以清代汉学家的著作为标准。朱子之学在乾隆时期逐渐失去其道统地位和学术范式地位,在《总目》中确有体现。
[Abstract]:The academic circles generally think that the evaluation of Zhu Xi is mainly critical. By combing and analyzing the works and academic viewpoints of Zhu Xi, it can be found that the main contents of "Siku Guanshu" are the main ones. It is a complete negation of Zhu Zi's introduction to the Book of changes and the theory of divinatory change, the preface of the Book of Poems, the poem, etc. On the other hand, Zhu Xi's argumentation in the aspects of "Shang Shu", "Spring and Autumn", "three Rites", "four Books" and so on is basically agreed from the academic point of view. From the academic point of view, it is based on the works of the Sinologists in the Qing Dynasty. Zhu Zi's studies gradually lost their status as the Taoist system and the academic paradigm during the Qianlong period, and they are indeed embodied in the General catalogue.
【作者单位】：山东师范大学齐鲁文化研究院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重点研究基地齐鲁文化研究中心“十三五”规划项目“齐鲁文化与中华文明转化创新” 国家社科基金重大项目“四库提要汇辑汇校汇考”(项目编号:15ZDB075)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G257

【相似文献】