期刊编委比非编委论文作者能更早探测出研究前沿吗

发布时间：2018-04-09 23:30

本文选题：期刊编委　切入点：非编委论文作者　出处：《情报杂志》2017年08期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]期刊编委是"科学的守门人",能够把握期刊的办刊方向,并合理选择哪篇论文更适合在本刊出版。因此,期刊编委理应比非编委的论文作者对本领域的前沿动态有较早的察觉和高度的敏感。基于此,提出了期刊编委能否比非编委的论文作者更早探测到研究前沿的问题。[方法/过程]以科学计量学领域为研究对象,构建了不重复的期刊编委数据集和非编委论文作者数据集,通过比较两个数据集中重复前沿所占的比例来判断究竟是期刊编委较早探测到研究前沿还是非编委论文作者较早探测到前沿。[结果/结论]大多数情况下,期刊编委比非编委论文作者能够较早地探测到同一个研究前沿。在极少数情况下,期刊编委能够与非编委论文作者同时探测到同一个研究前沿。
[Abstract]:The journal editorial committee is the "gatekeeper of science", which can grasp the running direction of the journal and choose which paper is more suitable for publication in this journal.Therefore, the journal editorial committee should have earlier detection and high sensitivity to the frontier development of the field than the author of the non-editorial committee.Based on this, the question of whether the journal editorial committee can detect the research frontier earlier than the author of the non-editorial committee is put forward.[method / process] taking the field of scientific metrology as the research object, the authors' data set of non-repeated periodical editorial committee and non-editorial committee paper were constructed.By comparing the proportion of repetitive frontiers in the two data sets, it is determined whether the periodical editorial committee detected the research frontier earlier or the author of the non-editorial committee did so earlier.[results / conclusion] in most cases, journal editors can detect the same research frontier earlier than non-editorial paper authors.In rare cases, journal editors can simultaneously detect the same research frontier as non-editorial paper authors.
【作者单位】：山西财经大学;中国科学院兰州文献情报中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金面上项目“气候变化科学成果集成研究范式及其实现平台研究”(编号:41671535)研究成果之一 ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金项目“中国学者的会议论文产出影响力及其对科研人员排名的影响研究——基于Scopus数据库的分析”研究成果之一
【分类号】：G353.1

【相似文献】