中日印韩科技期刊作者国际化水平及学术影响力分析与评价

发布时间：2018-10-31 08:52

【摘要】：科技期刊的作者国际化水平是评价一种期刊国际化程度和学术影响力的重要依据。1980-1990年间,科学传播的国际化进程就已经被广泛提及,科技期刊作为传播科技知识和学术成果的重要载体,其国际化程度也被越来越多的国内外学者广泛关注并一时成为业界讨论的热点。众多学者认为,科技期刊的国际化表现在诸多方面,如论文质量的国际化、作者的国际化、读者的国际化、出版语言的国际化、编委构成的国际化、审稿的国际化、编排标准的国际化、编辑管理的国际化、印刷质量的国际化以及入选检索系统的国际化。其中,作者国际化是其显著特征之一。为分析和评价中、日、印、韩四国科技期刊作者国际化水平,探讨4个国家科技期刊作者国际化水平与其学术影响力的关系,以2015年版JCR数据库中收录的中、日、印、韩四国的149种SCI来源期刊为研究对象,其中中国39种,日本63种,印度23种,韩国24种,分别计算各期刊作者国际化分数(Fraction of Author Internationalization,FAI)(包括FAI1和FAI2)和作者国际化指数(Index of Author Internationalization,IAI)(包括IAI1和IAI2)比较中、日、印、韩四国期刊作者国际化水平,对4个国家期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2与影响因子进行相关分析,确定不同国家期刊作者国际化水平与学术影响力的关系。结果显示,(1)中国期刊FAI1、FAI2和IAI1最低,分别为0.230±0.167、0.382±0.233和0.0837±0.701;日本期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2均为最高,分别为0.480±0.230、0.579±0.276、0.162±0.084和0.223±0.110;印度期刊IAI2(0.135±0.752)。ANOVA检验结果显示四国FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.000,P=0.002,P=0.000和P=0.003)。中国与日本期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000和P=0.023);中国期刊分别与印度和韩国期刊FAI1相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.006,P=0.011);日本与印度期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.020,P=0.046,P=0.007和P=0.001);日本与韩国期刊的IAI1相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.022),印度与韩国期刊IAI2相比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.005)。其他国家间的作者国际化指标相比差异均无统计学意义。(2)中、日、印、韩四国影响因子分别为1.912±1.782、1.685±0.949、0.643±0.305和1.345±0.932。中国与印度期刊影响因子、日本与印度期刊影响因子以及印度与韩国期刊影响因子差异具有统计学意义(P值分别为0.000,0.000,和0.002)。(3)Pearson相关性检验结果显示中国期刊FAI1、FAI2、IAI1和IAI2与影响因子的相关系数分别为0.336(P=0.036)、0.551(P=0.000)、0.573(P=0.000)和0.720(P=0.000),差异均具有统计学意义。其他国家二者之间差异无统计学意义。以上结果提示(1)日本期刊作者国际化水平最高,中国最低。(2)印度期刊影响因子最低,中国、日本、韩国水平相当。(3)中国期刊作者国际化水平的提高对期刊学术影响力的提升具有积极作用,其他3个国家期刊作者国际化水平与期刊学术影响力无关。
[Abstract]:The level of internationalization of authors of sci-tech journals is an important basis for evaluating the degree of internationalization and academic influence of a journal. From 1980 to 1990, the process of internationalization of scientific communication has been widely mentioned. As an important carrier to disseminate scientific and technological knowledge and academic achievements, the degree of internationalization of sci-tech periodicals has been paid more and more attention by scholars at home and abroad and has become a hot topic in the field of discussion. Many scholars believe that the internationalization of sci-tech periodicals is manifested in many aspects, such as the internationalization of the quality of papers, the internationalization of authors, the internationalization of readers, the internationalization of publishing languages, the internationalization of the composition of editorial boards, and the internationalization of the review of manuscripts. Internationalization of layout standards, management of editors, internationalization of printing quality and internationalization of selected retrieval systems. Among them, author internationalization is one of its prominent characteristics. In order to analyze and evaluate the internationalized level of Chinese, Japanese, Indian and Korean sci-tech journal authors, and to explore the relationship between the authors' internationalization level and their academic influence in the four countries, the authors' international level and their academic influence are discussed in the 2015 edition of the JCR database, which includes China, Japan and India. 149 SCI journals from Korea, China, Japan, India and South Korea were studied, 39 of them were from China, 63 from Japan, 23 from India and 24 from South Korea, respectively. The international scores of journal authors were calculated by (Fraction of Author Internationalization,. FAI) (includes FAI1 and FAI2) and author internationalization index (Index of Author Internationalization,IAI) (including IAI1 and IAI2). The correlation between IAI1 and IAI2 and influencing factors was analyzed to determine the relationship between the internationalization level of journal authors and academic influence in different countries. The results showed that (1) the FAI1,FAI2 and IAI1 of Chinese periodicals were the lowest (0.230 卤0.167 卤0.382 卤0.233 and 0.0837 卤0.701, respectively); The FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 of Japanese periodicals were the highest (0.480 卤0.230, 0.579 卤0.276, 0.162 卤0.084 and 0.223 卤0.110, respectively). The results of IAI2 (0.135 卤0.752). ANOVA) test showed that there were significant differences between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in the four countries (P0. 000, P0. 002, P0. 000 and P0. 003). There were significant differences in FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between China and Japan (P0. 000, P0. 000 and P0. 023). The difference of FAI1 between Chinese journals and Indian and Korean periodicals was statistically significant (P0. 006 / P0. 011). The difference of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 between Japan and India was statistically significant (P0. 020, P0. 046, P0. 007 and P0. 001). The difference of IAI1 between Japanese and Korean journals was statistically significant (P0. 022), and the difference between Indian and Korean periodicals IAI2 was statistically significant (P0. 005). (2) the influencing factors of China, Japan, India and Korea were 1.912 卤1.7821.685 卤0.949 卤0.643 卤0.305 and 1.345 卤0.932, respectively. The influence factors of Chinese and Indian periodicals, Japanese and Indian journals and Indian and Korean periodicals were significantly different (P = 0.000, P < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 in Chinese periodicals were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively, and the correlation coefficients of FAI1,FAI2,IAI1 and IAI2 were 0.336 (P0. 036) and 0.551 (P0. 000), respectively. The difference was statistically significant between 0.573 (P0. 000) and 0.720 (P0. 000). There was no statistical difference between the other countries. The above results suggest that (1) Japanese journal authors have the highest internationalization level, while China is the lowest. (2) Indian journals have the lowest influencing factors, China, Japan, (3) the improvement of the internationalization level of Chinese periodical writers has a positive effect on the promotion of journal academic influence, but the other three countries have nothing to do with the academic influence of periodicals.
【学位授予单位】：新乡医学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G353.1

【参考文献】