国内外主要农业科研机构作物科学重点研究领域对比分析
[Abstract]:China is a big agricultural country in the world, and agriculture is a pillar industry. Crop science is the core subject in agricultural science system. The development of crop science is directly related to the development of agricultural science and technology. The main task of crop science is to study the genetic laws of crops and the related techniques of crop breeding to help cultivate good crop varieties. At the same time, we study the influence of external factors on crop growth and development, crop yield, crop quality, reveal its inherent law, help to achieve the goal of safe, high yield and good quality, thus providing agricultural products. Food security and sustainable agricultural development provide security. Agricultural scientific research institutions are the main body of agricultural scientific and technological innovation, its development relates to the national competitive advantage in agricultural science and technology and the ability of independent innovation, especially some major agricultural scientific research institutions play a key and leading role. Tracking the track of its research can not only predict the development trend of agricultural science and technology, promote the learning and exchange among institutions, realize the complementary advantages, but also help the country to formulate the development strategy of agricultural science and technology. We will raise the level of development of agricultural science and technology, ensure social stability and promote economic development. In this paper, taking crop science as an example and combining the results of the previous project of the research group, we select (CAAS), Chinese Agricultural University, (CAU), the Agricultural Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, (ARS), of the Bureau of Agricultural Research of the United States of America. (INRA) of French Academy of Agricultural Sciences and (NARO), of the National Agricultural Food Research Institute of Japan, six well-known agricultural research institutions at home and abroad, are the target institutions of this study. Considering that the range of crop scientific data is difficult to define, the data in this paper are mainly collected from two databases, web of science SCI citation database and CABI Abstract database. Combined with the characteristics of the two databases, using big data technology, which is popular nowadays, the data of the two databases are fused. Finally determine the range of research data. Based on the theory of bibliometrics, this paper uses the methods of citation analysis, content word analysis and Bibexcel,CiteSpace software to objectively and scientifically compare the output and interdisciplinary distribution of crop science papers in target institutions. Identifying the key research areas of crop science, and analyzing and comparing the scientific and technological output and influence of the six target institutions in the key research fields of crop science, namely, crop genetics and breeding. International cooperation and research topics. The results show that the basic research strength of crop science of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences continues to grow rapidly, but compared with the agricultural institutions of developed countries, there is still a big gap. The distribution pattern of the six target institutions in the field of crop science is similar, and the research field of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences has been continuously expanded and deepened, and gradually close to the well-known institutions abroad. The foreign institutions of international exchange and cooperation have obvious advantages, while the domestic institutions need to be improved. The six target institutions on the research subject have both common features and different emphases, which are worthy of learning and learning from each other.
【学位授予单位】:中国农业科学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S-0;G353.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜婷婷;范水香;陆伟;王淼;;基于NEViewer的国内外图书情报领域研究热点对比分析[J];情报科学;2016年02期
2 张璐;长青;齐二石;;文献计量视角下我国技术创新与管理创新领域对比研究[J];科技进步与对策;2015年06期
3 胡畔畔;薛晓芳;;基于TDA专利分析的可视化学科服务实例[J];医学信息学杂志;2014年12期
4 王俏;王伟;潘玮;张世玉;;基于文献共被引分析的医学信息学学科特征研究[J];医学信息学杂志;2014年04期
5 郭全珍;吕建国;;纳米功能材料领域研究前沿和发展趋势的可视化分析[J];情报杂志;2014年03期
6 张洋;谢齐;;基于社会网络分析的机构科研合作关系研究[J];图书情报知识;2014年02期
7 沈同平;杨松涛;储节旺;;基于共词分析方法的国内知识链研究热点分析[J];新世纪图书馆;2014年01期
8 沈思;;中英两国在环境学科领域的合作与对比研究[J];图书与情报;2013年04期
9 滕蔓;;中英两国在地球与空间科学领域的合作与对比研究[J];图书与情报;2013年03期
10 朱云霞;;中英两国在数学领域的合作与对比研究[J];图书与情报;2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 焦宏官;基于SCIE的国际针灸热点及合作团队研究[D];中国中医科学院;2013年
2 魏建香;学科交叉知识发现及其可视化研究[D];南京大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 史纪元;基于CiteSpaceⅢ输血医学研究领域知识图谱分析[D];第四军医大学;2015年
2 刘进;基于关键词共词分析的我国新课改热点研究[D];陕西师范大学;2014年
3 许友权;核聚类算法研究及其在文本聚类中的应用[D];江苏科技大学;2014年
4 刘健;国外元数据研究前沿与热点可视化探讨[D];南京大学;2013年
5 孙晓宁;国内知识管理学科体系结构可视化研究[D];安徽大学;2013年
6 张建东;基于知识图谱的国内外知识管理研究领域对比分析[D];东北大学;2011年
7 许丽利;聚类分析的算法及应用[D];吉林大学;2010年
8 杨颖;基于共词分析的学科结构可视化研究[D];中国医科大学;2010年
9 李淑丽;信息可视化工具的比较研究[D];黑龙江大学;2006年
,本文编号:2346231
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/tushudanganlunwen/2346231.html