审稿工作价值论

发布时间：2018-04-17 01:03

本文选题：审稿工作 + 三审制　；参考：《编辑学刊》1994年04期

【摘要】：正在我国,从五十年代出版社逐渐建立起,编辑工作一直是出版社的中心工作.而在编辑工作中,审稿又一直是编辑工作的中心.各级编辑人员的全部工作中,审稿工作都占有很大的分量.虽然审稿工作一向受到重视,但对审稿工作意义的认识,却可以说一直是不够全面的,而只是片面地强调了它的“把关”意义.人们不仅在口头上把审稿称之为“把关”,出版社的老编辑、领导对青年编辑也只是强调审稿就是“把关”、审稿就要“把好关”等等.以致于后来在一些文章中,也是这样说.日渐月染,审稿就似乎即“把关”,“把关”就似乎即审稿,二者仿佛变成为同义词了.将审稿等同于“把关”,实际是以偏概全了,是没有全面认识到审稿的意义.所谓“把关”,指的主要是“把政治关”——虽然有时其意义是超出“把政治关”,但实际就是要防止政治性错误.政治性错误自然是应该防止的,不能让我们的出版物中出现政治性错误,因此,“政治关”是应该要“把”住的,这点自然没有问题.因为,我们出版事业是“党领导的社会主义事业的一个组成部分”,审稿工作就具有政治性工作的性质.把住政治关,无疑也就是审稿工作的重要内容之一.但审稿的意义、作用决不仅仅是“把关”,因而也不能把审稿与“把关”等同起来.“把关”只是审稿意义、作用的一个方面,
[Abstract]:In China, since the establishment of publishing houses in the 1950's, editorial work has been the central work of publishing houses.In the editing work, the review of manuscripts has always been the center of editing work.In all the work of editors at all levels, the work of reviewing manuscripts occupies a great deal of weight.Although the work of reviewing manuscripts has always been attached importance to, the understanding of the significance of the work of reviewing manuscripts can be said to be not comprehensive all the time, but only to emphasize the significance of its "gateways" in a one-sided way.Not only do people verbally call the review of manuscripts as "gateways," the old editors of publishing houses and the leaders only emphasize that the examination of manuscripts is "gateways," and so on.Even later in some articles, the same is said.With each passing day, it'seems to be "gateways" and "gateways" as if to review manuscripts. Both seem to be synonymous with each other.To equate the review of manuscripts with "gateways" is in fact a partial summary, and the significance of reviewing manuscripts is not fully recognized.The so-called "gatekeeper" means mainly to "lock politics"-although sometimes its meaning is to "close politics", but in practice it is to prevent political mistakes.Political mistakes should naturally be prevented and political errors must not be allowed to appear in our publications. Therefore, it is only natural that "political mistakes" should be "taken care of".Because our publishing industry is "an integral part of the socialist cause led by the Party," the work of reviewing manuscripts has the nature of political work.Keeping a close to politics is undoubtedly one of the important contents of the work of reviewing manuscripts.However, the significance of reviewing manuscripts is not merely "gateways", and therefore it cannot be equated with "gateways"."gateways" are only one aspect of the significance and function of reviewing manuscripts.
【作者单位】：百花文艺出版社
【分类号】：G232

【相似文献】