审稿中新颖性标准的内涵

发布时间：2018-05-18 03:20

本文选题：新颖性 + 科学研究　；参考：《编辑学刊》1997年01期

【摘要】：正新颖性是编辑需要坚持的一条重要审稿标准。关于新颖性标准的内涵,出版理论界至今仍众说纷纭,莫衷一是,这无疑影响了编辑在实际工作中对新颖性标准的把握和执行。有位很有声望的外国学者说:中国每年有上千篇的中国古代史论文发表,但是可读的并不多。这话虽有点夸大且只为针对中国古代史研究而言,但其反映出来的某种倾向于出版界则普遍存在,即缺少创见、毫无“新颖”之处的作品在时下出版物中占了相当多的份量。本文根据辩证唯物主义关于时间、空间和结构是事物三种存在方式与固有属性的观点,将新颖性标准相应划分为体现时间存在形态的新的问题和新的观念、体现空间存在形态的新的领域和新的材料、体现结构存在形态的新的方法和新的角度六个类型,依次略作申述,以求教于编辑界同仁。
[Abstract]:Novelty is an important standard for editors to review manuscripts. There are still different opinions on the connotation of novelty standard in the publishing theory circle, which undoubtedly affects the editor's grasp and implementation of novelty standard in practical work. There are thousands of ancient Chinese papers published every year in China, but not many can be read, said one prestigious foreign scholar. Although this is a little exaggerated and only for the study of ancient Chinese history, it reflects a certain tendency in the publishing world, that is, the lack of originality and lack of "novelty" works in the current publication has a considerable weight. Based on the dialectical materialism's view that time, space and structure are three ways of existence and inherent attributes of things, this paper divides the criterion of novelty into new problems and new concepts that reflect the existence of time. In order to seek advice from editors, six types of new fields and materials, new methods and new angles of structural existential forms are presented in order to reflect the spatial existential form and the new materials, respectively, in order to seek advice from their colleagues in the editorial circle.
【作者单位】：《煤炭高等教育》编辑部
【分类号】：G232

【共引文献】