中国高校学报传统析论——兼论高校学报体制改革的目标与路径

发布时间：2018-06-19 21:19

本文选题：高校学报 + 学术期刊传统　；参考：《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年05期

【摘要】：高校学报的历史和传统与学报的现状和未来有着难以割裂的关系,了解学报的历史和传统是制定现行改革政策的前提。学报传统可以追溯到20世纪初,以《学桴》、《清华学报》和《北京大学月刊》为代表的早期学报铸就了最初的传统。其核心价值是以开放的心态追求真理、传播学术、引领时代,综合性或专业性则是其外部形式特征。1950年代,传统发生"裂变",中国科学院传承了传统的核心价值,着手构建以开放的专业期刊为主体的学术期刊体系;高校学报则拘泥于传统的综合性学报的外在形式,并坚持稿源的内向性。对传统在不同向度上的继承造就了两类期刊的不同命运。今天的许多管理者和学报人往往错把1950年代以来逐步固化的综合性、内向性模式当成了学报的传统,学报体制更形僵化。因此,学报的改革是必要的,但应该改革和如何改革是两个不同的问题,改革成功与否取决于改革是否有清晰的目标和可行的路径和手段。在新闻出版总署新近颁布的《关于报刊编辑部体制改革的实施办法》中,"转企"这个改革的手段已取代了目标。学报改革的目标应该是科学合理的学报体系的构建,为达此目标,比笼统"转企"更为可行的手段,是将纸本学报与数字化学报分开,将学报编辑与出版发行分开对待的"两分开"办法。
[Abstract]:The history and tradition of college journals are closely related to the present situation and future of journals. Understanding the history and tradition of journals is the premise of formulating current reform policies. The tradition of journals can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century. The early journals, such as "Learning Drum", "Tsinghua University Journal" and "monthly Journal of Peking University", as the representative, cast the original tradition. Its core value is to pursue truth with an open mind, to spread learning, to lead the times, comprehensive or professional is its external form characteristic. In 1950s, the tradition "fission" occurred, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences inherited the core value of tradition. The academic periodical system with the open professional periodical as the main body is constructed, while the university journal is bound by the external form of the traditional comprehensive journal and insists on the introversion of the manuscript source. The inheritance of tradition in different dimensions has created different fates of two kinds of periodicals. Nowadays, many managers and journals tend to mistake the gradual solidification of comprehensiveness and introversion model as the tradition of the journal, and the journal system is even more rigid. Therefore, the reform of journals is necessary, but should be reformed and how to reform are two different problems, the success of reform depends on whether the reform has a clear goal and feasible path and means. In the newly promulgated measures on the Reform of the editorial Department of the Press and publication, the reform means of "changing enterprises" has replaced the goal. The goal of journal reform should be the construction of a scientific and reasonable journal system. In order to achieve this goal, it is more feasible to achieve this goal than to "convert enterprises" in general, which is to separate the paper-based journal from the digital journal. The "two separate" method of separating journal editing from publishing and publishing.
【作者单位】：清华大学学报编辑部;清华大学历史系;南京大学学报编辑部;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究2009年度一般项目“教育部名刊工程绩效报告及趋势研究”(09YJAZH043)
【分类号】：G237.5

【参考文献】