研究生学位论文所用研究方法的分析

发布时间：2018-05-28 21:21

本文选题：课程与教学论 + 研究生学位论文　；参考：《华东师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本研究对某大学2001-2014年课程与教学论专业研究生225篇学位论文所使用的研究方法进行分析、分类和统计。根据布雷钦卡的《教育知识的哲学》,同时参考了刘良华的《教育研究方法》,本研究建立了基本的分析框架,大体将研究方法分成了三类,即哲学研究、实证研究以及实践研究。在对225篇论文的研究方法进行归类时,以具体实例解释了归类原则,保证了研究的信度。许多研究认为,研究生学位论文研究方法的使用特点是：1.呈现出由单一走向多元化的趋势,2.思辨研究(哲学研究)和实践研究偏多,实证研究偏少,3.质的研究偏多,量的研究偏少。本文就以此三点作为研究假设,开始调查研究。通过研究,研究者发现,有98.2%的论文使用实证研究,可见实证研究已成为该大学课程与教学论专业学位论文的主流；研究方法运用的总体趋势呈现多样化,在2006年之后,频繁得出现新的研究方法；有59.8%的硕士论文和57.9%的博士论文使用了质的研究,无论是博士论文还是硕士论文,质的研究使用频率均略大于量的研究。本研究的结论与假设略有出入,本文尝试着对这种不同做出了解释。同时,本研究发现,研究者对研究方法的选择与其学历背景和性别差异存在一定的相关性。同时,本研究还发现硕博士生在学位论文研究方法的使用中存在很多的问题,比如不呈现自己的“研究方法”,以硕士研究生为例,有17篇论文未注明研究方法,又如研究方法表述不规范,以文献法为例,研究者对其的称谓有文献分析法、文献法、文献探讨、文献研究、文献分析法、文献检索法、文献分析等等。论文建议强化专业硕士研究生和博士研究生有关教育研究方法和学术写作规范的训练。
[Abstract]:This study analyzes, classifies and counts the research methods used by 225 graduate students majoring in curriculum and teaching theory in a university from 2001 to 2014. According to Brachinka's philosophy of Educational knowledge, and referring to Liu Lianghua's Educational Research method, this study establishes a basic analytical framework and generally divides the research methods into three categories: philosophical study, empirical study and practical study. In the classification of 225 research methods, the principle of classification is explained with concrete examples, and the reliability of the research is ensured. Many studies believe that the use of graduate thesis research methods is characterized by 1: 1. There is a trend from single to diversified. Speculative research (philosophical research) and practical research are on the side, while empirical research is less than 3. 5%. The study of quality is more than that of quantity. This article takes this three points as the research hypothesis, starts the investigation and research. Through the research, the researchers found that 98.2% of the papers use empirical research, which shows that the empirical research has become the mainstream of the academic dissertation of curriculum and teaching theory, and the overall trend of the use of research methods is diversified, after 2006, 59.8% of master's thesis and 57.9% of doctoral thesis use qualitative research, and the frequency of qualitative research is slightly higher than that of quantitative research. The conclusion of this study is slightly different from that of hypothesis, and this paper tries to explain this difference. At the same time, this study found that the choice of research methods is related to their educational background and gender differences. At the same time, this study also found that there are many problems in the use of research methods for graduate students, such as not presenting their own "research methods", and taking graduate students as an example, 17 papers do not indicate the research methods. For example, literature analysis, literature discussion, literature research, literature analysis, literature retrieval, literature analysis and so on. This paper suggests strengthening the training of educational research methods and academic writing norms for graduate and doctoral students.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G643.8

【相似文献】