学术期刊的综合评价研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 08:43

本文关键词：学术期刊的综合评价研究　出处：《华中师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来,我国学术期刊快速发展,办刊质量有很大提高。但与此同时,期刊发行量少,学术影响力不足。期刊学术影响力一直是社会和学术界关注的焦点。学术期刊作为刊载学术论文和科研成果的载体,对科学技术和社会进步起到了一定的推动作用。期刊评价经历了30多年的历程,学术期刊的评价是期刊质量发展的的“指挥棒”,是期刊工作者和图书情报研究人员研究的重要课题。学术期刊质量的传统评价方法,无论是国内还是国外都主要以单指标评价为主。单指标评价主要集中在影响因子指标,影响因子指标易于操作,便于比较。但是采用影响因子指标存在一定的局限性。学科的不同、期刊性质的不同、引用行为的不确定性等,例如错引、自引、漏引等均会不同程度的影响期刊质量的评价。因此本文提出了学术期刊影响力的综合评价。本文以信息计量学为研究基础。旨在探索学术期刊影响力综合评价指标体系的构建。在构建的过程中创新性的提出了高被引论文的比例,web高下载论文比例作为评价指标。并且论证了采用高被引论文的比例,Web高下载论文比例作为评价指标的合理性。然后,探索性的构建了学术期刊影响力的综合评价指标体系。并且运用构建出的指标体系对管理学主要期刊进行了学术影响力分析。本文分为六个部分：第一章介绍了国内外期刊评价的现状,并且总结了国内外期刊评价存在的问题与不足之处。第二章作为基础性章节,论述了学术期刊影响力的概念以及学术期刊影响力的构成要素。并且论述了学术期刊影响力评价中应注意的几个问题,重点阐述学术论文影响力、核心期刊影响力、传播方式等与学术期刊影响力的关系与区别。第三章承上启下,首先介绍了现行学术期刊评价模式；然后介绍了学术期刊影响力的定性评价；其次分析了学术期刊的单指标评价体系与多指标评价体系；最后,分析了学术期刊影响力评价指标体系存在的一些问题。第四章介绍了学术期刊影响力综合评价指标体系的构建。主要介绍了综合评价指标体系选取的原则、各指标体系选取的原因。第五章是一个实证研究。以管理学主要期刊为评价对象,以第四章中构建的评价体系为理论基础。评价了管理类期刊的学术影响力。评价结果更为符合客观实际。第六章为总结性章节。总结了期刊综合评价中应把握的几个问题。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, academic journals in China have developed rapidly and the quality of periodicals has been greatly improved, but at the same time, the circulation of periodicals is small. Academic influence is not enough. Academic influence of periodicals has always been the focus of social and academic attention. Academic journals as a carrier of academic papers and scientific research results. The evaluation of journals has experienced more than 30 years, and the evaluation of academic journals is the "baton" of the development of periodical quality. It is an important subject for periodical workers and library and information researchers. The traditional evaluation method of academic periodical quality is mainly single index evaluation, which is mainly focused on the influence factor index, and the influence factor index is easy to operate. It is easy to compare. However, there are some limitations in using the index of influence factors, such as different disciplines, different nature of periodicals, uncertainty of citation behavior, such as misquotation and self-citation. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation of the influence of academic journals is put forward in this paper. Based on information metrology, this paper aims to explore the construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for the influence of academic journals. The proportion of web high download papers is used as the evaluation index, and the rationality of using the ratio of high citation papers and web high download papers as the evaluation index is demonstrated. Then. This paper constructs the comprehensive evaluation index system of the influence of academic journals, and analyzes the academic influence of the main journals of management by using the index system. This paper is divided into six parts: The first chapter introduces the current situation of periodical evaluation at home and abroad, and summarizes the problems and shortcomings of periodical evaluation at home and abroad. The second chapter, as a basic chapter, discusses the concept of the influence of academic journals and the constituent elements of the influence of academic journals, and discusses several issues that should be paid attention to in the evaluation of the influence of academic journals. The relationship and difference between the influence of academic papers, the influence of core journals and the mode of communication are discussed. The third chapter introduces the current evaluation model of academic journals. Then it introduces the qualitative evaluation of the influence of academic journals. Secondly, the single-index evaluation system and the multi-index evaluation system of academic journals are analyzed. Finally, some problems in the evaluation index system of academic journals' influence are analyzed. Chapter 4th introduces the construction of the comprehensive evaluation index system of the influence of academic journals, mainly introduces the selection principles of the comprehensive evaluation index system and the reasons for the selection of each index system. Chapter 5th is an empirical study. Based on the evaluation system set up in Chapter 4th, this paper evaluates the academic influence of management journals. The evaluation results are more in line with the objective reality. Chapter 6th is a summative chapter. This paper summarizes some problems that should be grasped in the comprehensive evaluation of periodicals.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：G353.1

【引证文献】