应用加权秩和比法作医学期刊学术质量综合评价的研究

发布时间：2019-03-12 14:31

【摘要】：目的分析加权秩和比法在医学期刊学术质量综合评价中的适用性。方法随机抽取40种医学期刊,选择目前反映期刊学术质量常用的总被引频次、影响因子、基金论文比、他引率和平均引文数等5项评价指标,采用加权秩和比法对预防医学期刊学术质量进行综合评价,并用Kappa系数与是否进入核心期刊进行一致性检验。结果 40种医学期刊中,较差期刊(WRSR估计值0.204)2种,一般期刊(WRSR估计值为0.204~)17种,良好期刊(WRSR估计值为0.498~)18种,优秀期刊(WRSR估计值为0.792~)3种。对4个等级期刊WRSR估计值进行单因素方差分析,结果证明不同等级期刊学术质量差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。按是否进入核心期刊对期刊分档结果进行一致性评价,Kappa系数为0.554,属于中、高度一致性。结论加权秩和比法简单直观,对医学期刊学术质量综合评价结果较为客观,可试用于医学期刊的学术质量评价。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the applicability of weighted rank sum ratio in comprehensive evaluation of academic quality of medical journals. Methods 40 kinds of medical journals were randomly selected, and 5 evaluation indexes, such as total citation frequency, influencing factors, ratio of fund papers, other citation rate and average citation number, were selected to reflect the academic quality of journals. The weighted rank sum ratio method was used to evaluate the academic quality of preventive medical journals, and the consistency test was carried out between the Kappa coefficient and whether or not to enter the core journals. Results among the 40 medical journals, there were 2 poor journals (WRSR estimate 0.204), 17 general journals (WRSR = 0.204 ~), 18 good journals (WRSR = 0.498 ~), and 3 excellent journals (WRSR estimates = 0.792 ~). One-way ANOVA analysis was carried out to estimate the WRSR of four journals. The results showed that there was a significant difference in academic quality among the journals of different grades (P < 0. 000). The Kappa coefficient is 0.554, which belongs to the middle and high consistency, according to whether to enter the core journal to evaluate the consistency of the journal filing results. Conclusion the method of weighted rank sum ratio is simple and intuitive. The results of comprehensive evaluation of academic quality of medical journals are objective and can be used to evaluate the academic quality of medical journals.
【作者单位】：浙江大学公共卫生学院;《浙江预防医学》编辑部;
【分类号】：G353.1;R-05

【参考文献】