清初社盟文人与文学不应被文学史书写边缘化——晚明士人价值取向与清初文学多样化新格局重构

发布时间：2018-01-08 04:02

  本文关键词：清初社盟文人与文学不应被文学史书写边缘化——晚明士人价值取向与清初文学多样化新格局重构　出处：《河北学刊》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 文学史 社盟文人 清初文学 多样化重建 边缘化

【摘要】：文学的繁荣与社会政治关系密切。朝政的文艺走向影响了文学家的创作趋向,文坛风气也由庙堂需求决定。清初文学就是这样。明代文柄下移,文学家为了文坛自立组织文学社盟。清初禁立文人结社,文柄上行,其权在朝廷之贤公卿,清初文学因此表现出庙堂倾向。但随着笔者对明清文学家结盟进程研究的深入,清初这样的文学样态显然并不完全符合文学历史的真实。明末文学家皆有结社经历并受社盟培养,形成以社盟文学为主流文学的文学样态,明亡后,社盟文人选择了不同的人生方向,以不同的方式影响着当时文坛,使得清初文学呈现出多样化样态。因此,对清初文学的研究就不能集中在受朝政推崇和影响的几位文学大家,还应关注被朝廷边缘化的社盟文人及其形成的文坛新格局,清初社盟文人与文学不应被文学史书写边缘化,这是清初文学研究当慎重思之的。
[Abstract]:The prosperity of literature is closely related to social politics. The trend of literature and art in the imperial government has influenced the writers' writing tendency, and the literary atmosphere is also determined by the demand of the temple and hall. This is the case in the literature of the early Qing Dynasty. For the sake of the literary world, the writers organized the literary association. In the early Qing Dynasty, the literati association was banned, and the power of the literati was in the imperial court. Therefore, the literature of the early Qing Dynasty showed a tendency of temple and hall, but with the further study of the process of alliance between the writers of the Ming and Qing dynasties. At the end of Ming Dynasty, all writers had the experience of association and were trained by the Social League, forming the literary form of the mainstream literature of the Social Union, which died in Ming Dynasty. The scholars of the League of Social Union chose different life directions and influenced the literary world in different ways, which made the literature of the early Qing Dynasty take on a variety of forms. The study of the literature in the early Qing Dynasty could not focus on several literature people who were respected and influenced by the government, but also should pay attention to the literati who had been marginalized by the court and the new pattern of literary circles formed by them. In the early Qing Dynasty, scholars and literature should not be marginalized by the writing of literary history, which should be considered carefully in the study of literature in the early Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 河北省社会科学院;
【分类号】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 清初禁立文人结社,文柄上行,其权在朝廷之贤公卿。清初文学表现出庙堂倾向,文学史著“清初文学”章节便以受朝政推崇的庙堂文学家为刚,以文学成就为线进行编写。随着笔者对明清文学家结盟进程研究的深入,清初这样的文学样态显然不完全符合文学历史的真实。明末文学家皆有结社，

本文编号：1395507