从新月派的文学史评述看《中国现代文学三十年》与《中国新文学史稿》之异同

发布时间：2018-01-15 22:12

本文关键词：从新月派的文学史评述看《中国现代文学三十年》与《中国新文学史稿》之异同　出处：《名作欣赏》2016年36期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：王瑶的《中国新文学史稿》(以下简称《史稿》)和由钱理群、温儒敏、吴福辉等人编写的《中国现代文学三十年》(以下简称《三十年》)是最具代表性的现代文学史著作。通过比较两部文学史著作对新月派及其诗人和作品的艺术价值分析与文学史地位的评定,试浅析两代学者在审美标准、文学史体系的建构、叙述话语以及文学史观等方面的差异。诚然,造成这些差异的原因有政治体制、思想潮流等因素的影响,但同时也意味着,在历史前进中的现代文学史书写的传承与突破。
[Abstract]:Wang Yao's "Historical draft of Chinese New Literature" (hereinafter referred to as "Historical manuscript") and by Qian Liqun, Wen Ruimin. Thirty years of Modern Chinese Literature written by Wu Fuhui et al. (hereinafter referred to as < 30 years >). It is the most representative works of modern literary history. By comparing the two works of literary history, this paper analyzes the artistic value of the New Moon School and its poets and works, and evaluates the status of literary history. This paper tries to analyze the differences between the two generations of scholars in the aspects of aesthetic standards, the construction of literary history system, the narrative discourse and the view of literary history. It is true that the reasons for these differences are the influence of political system, ideological trend and other factors. But at the same time, it also means the inheritance and breakthrough of the writing of modern literary history.
【作者单位】：宁波大学人文与传媒学院;
【分类号】：I206.6-5
【正文快照】： 新诗作为中国新文学的先锋始终在不同版本的文学史中占有重要篇幅,而横贯中国现代文学前两个十年的新月派则又是新诗发展史上的重要一笔,并且在相当长的一段时间内影响着中国现代诗歌的发展走向。一个在中国新诗发展的初期占据诗坛主流地位的诗歌流派,其文学史书写是任何一个

【相似文献】