从当代中国几次文学论战看理想的文学批评之建构

发布时间：2018-01-17 17:30

本文关键词：从当代中国几次文学论战看理想的文学批评之建构　出处：《华文文学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文所探讨的"十七年"时期姚文元所参与的文学论战、"文革"结束之后的《苦恋》论争风波以及2000年初的《钢铁是怎样炼成的》论战,代表了当代中国三个不同思想时空的文学批评论争样貌,但共同点是:论战一方希望维持马克思主义作为文学批评的主导观念和方法,进而达到巩固既有意识形态主导地位的目的,故而他们将文学批评视为一种任务(task)或使命(mission);而另一方则试图将文学批评定位在艺术审美层面,一些知识分子更是将文学批评作为历史重构和解析的工具。因此,文学批评与文学的学术研究具有本质的不同,理想的文学批评乃是多元的观点、批评视角与批评方法的融合。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the literature controversy in the "seventeen years" period in which Yao Wenyuan participated, the "bitter love" controversy after the end of the "Cultural Revolution" and the "how Steel was refined" debate in early 2000. It represents the debate of literary criticism in three different ideological spaces in contemporary China, but the common point is that one side of the argument wants to maintain Marxism as the dominant concept and method of literary criticism. In order to consolidate the dominant position of ideology, they regarded literary criticism as a kind of task) or mission. The other side tries to position literary criticism on the aesthetic level of art, and some intellectuals regard literary criticism as a tool of historical reconstruction and analysis. Literary criticism is essentially different from literary academic research. The ideal literary criticism is a pluralistic point of view and a combination of critical perspectives and critical methods.
【作者单位】：香港城市大学中文及历史学系;
【分类号】：I206.7
【正文快照】： 1949年之后的中国,左翼的社会主义意识形态从原本作为一种文艺理论的流派,随着中国政权的更动,而逐渐具备了文艺批评方法的正统性。此种批评模式将一切文艺作品从阶级分析法与历史唯物主义的视角进行解读,从“世界观——方法论”的哲学模式去审视文学作品的优劣。原本,文学批

【相似文献】