茅盾文学奖终评落选作品研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 06:57

本文关键词： 茅盾文学奖落选作品文学地位意识形态文学观念评奖机制　出处：《中南民族大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：国内最高级别的文学大奖——茅盾文学奖从1982年首届评奖以来便备受争议,争论的焦点集中在评选结果的“鱼目混珠”和“遗珠之憾”。获奖作品在文学界引起了不同争论,有些落选作品却在文学界和文学史上具有较高的地位。茅盾文学奖落选作品作为一个特殊的文学现象已引起人们的关注。关于茅盾文学奖的研究,学界的视野大多集中在其外部研究和获奖作品文本研究,而对落选作品关注较少。但是,茅盾文学奖的设立伴随着新时期文学的成长,落选作品也可以反映新时期文学的发展。例如,首届除了《李自成》之外,有影响力的作品还有《人啊,人》、《代价》、《蹉跎岁月》等,这些作品是一项国家级的大奖所不能忽视的。第三届评奖年份中,《古船》、《活动变人形》同样是绕不开的作品。第五届《马桥词典》和第六届《檀香刑》无缘茅盾文学奖不得不说是一大憾事。本文试图从茅盾文学奖终评落选作品着手,以文本细读和文学外部研究相结合的方式,对终评落选作品作一个整体的研究,通过对落选作品原因分析,提出改善茅盾文学奖评奖机制建议,希望能建立更加完善的评奖机制。第一章对终评落选作品进行回顾和概览,分析这些作品在当时的落选情况、文学界的评价、创作方法和文学地位。由此,我们可以看出落选作品的整体面貌和文学价值。第二章分析落选作品无缘茅盾文学奖的原因,包括该奖项的意识形态属性、茅盾现实主义创作传统和评委既定的文学观念等因素。必要的原因分析有利于我们找出“茅盾文学奖”受公众诟病的症结所在。第三章透过落选原因分析,我们能有的放矢地提出完善评奖机制的建议。包括保持文学评奖的独立性、鼓励多元化的创作方法和优化评奖程序,在原则和操作程序上完善和改进。文学评奖不仅仅是一项荣誉的确立,更是文学资源和价值的挖掘。尽管文学评奖受各方因素的影响,无法做到绝对的公平和公正。但积极地调整和改进可控制的因素,是树立其品牌、建立公信力的必要举措。
[Abstract]:Mao Dun Literature Award, the highest literary award in China, has been controversial since the first prize in 1982. The focus of the controversy is on the results of the award, "mixed with Fish and Pearl" and "the regret of the bead." the winning works have caused different debates in the literary world. However, some of the lost works have a high status in the literary world and literary history. As a special literary phenomenon, the lost works of Mao Dun Prize for Literature have attracted people's attention. The academic field of vision mostly focuses on its external research and the text study of the winning works, but it pays less attention to the lost works. However, the establishment of the Mao Dun Prize for Literature has been accompanied by the growth of literature in the new period. The lost works can also reflect the development of literature in the new period. For example, in addition to Li Zicheng, the first influential works also included "people, people," "cost," "wasted time," and so on. These works can not be ignored by a national prize. In the third year of the prize, "Ancient ship", "changing the shape of the activity" is also an inextricable work. The 5th "Maqiao Dictionary" and the 6th "Honolulu penalty" did not have the chance of Mao Dun. The literature prize has to be said to be a great pity. This paper attempts to start with the final evaluation of the lost works of Mao Dun Literature Award. In the way of combination of text reading and literature external study, this paper makes a whole research on the final evaluation of the unsuccessful works, and through the analysis of the causes of the lost works, puts forward some suggestions to improve the mechanism of Mao Dun Literature Award. I hope to establish a more perfect mechanism of award evaluation. Chapter one reviews and summarizes the final evaluation of the unsuccessful works, analyzes the situation of these works at that time, the evaluation of the literary world, the method of creation and the status of literature. We can see the overall appearance and literary value of the lost works. Chapter two analyzes the reasons why the lost works were not awarded the Mao Dun Literature Award, including the ideological attributes of the award. Such factors as Mao Dun's realistic writing tradition and the established literary ideas of the judges. The necessary cause analysis is helpful for us to find out where the crux of the "Mao Dun Literature Award" has been criticized by the public. Chapter three analyzes the reasons for losing the election. We are able to put forward targeted proposals to improve the award mechanism, including maintaining the independence of literary awards, encouraging diverse creative methods and optimizing the award process, Perfecting and improving in principles and procedures. Literary awards are not only an honor to be established, but also a mining of literary resources and values. Although literary awards are influenced by various factors, It is impossible to achieve absolute fairness and justice. But positive adjustment and improvement of controllable factors are necessary measures to establish its brand and build credibility.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I207.42

【相似文献】